Posts on X before Mar 22, 2026, 6:20:24 AM UTC

Media attached to this post
We just released Claude Code channels, which allows you to control your Claude Code session through select MCPs, starting with Telegram and Discord. Use this to message Claude Code directly from your phone.
no one is sharing, it hasn't been able to keep up, and now that gap will widen exponentially the best they can do is imitation of these models
open source ai must flourish
systems complexity should come from the system, not the AI set up put harnesses and blockades up for your runs, not your agents
friendly reminder, Q1 2026 hasn't even ended yet if you think the field is unrecognizable since December (which if you don't feel that, you're not pushing hard enough/up to date)... just know it hasn't even been a full 3 months since then imagine 9 months (EOY). lmao buckle up
soon, salary is going to matter a lot less than your ITB (individual token budget) working for $250k with a $1m token budget per year will be leagues more fun/growing than even $500k but needing to beg for tokens this is already the case at the top of the competition
the problem with this tweet is that if anyone else said this we'd all laugh but it's elon we're talking about here most will still laugh, sure, although that laughter is now nervous laughter rather than making-fun-of laughter
@peterwildeford xAI will catch up this year and then exceed them all by such a long distance in 3 years that you will need the James Webb telescope to see who is in second place
if you haven't realized the below statement after seeing what @karpathy and @tobi have done just this past week or so, you're ngmi :(
People are seriously underestimating how quickly and easily apparently major bottlenecks to progress will be resolved
it's the first model to refer to itself constantly as "model", as in, "model thinks xyz. model thinks that's good idea and something to explore. model thinks this is a benchmark and will tryhard."
Functionalists will say that not only is GPT 5.4 conscious, but those "other language models" it's imagining while decoding this CoT are too x.com/blingdivinity/…
Rarely should you ever be steering with follow-up messages. Most of the time, queuing next messages produces much higher-quality results than steering the model in the middle of what it's doing.
RAM on your macbook will basically become an intelligence potential marker instead of "how many things at once can I be doing" it turns into "how much intelligence at once can I be generating"
The top .1% of users are playing with local LLMS This will 10x every 12 months.... Until Apple, Dell and MSFT have one on your local device BY DEFAULT in 2028 This takes the local hardware spec race from irrelevant for 99% of users to critical. Going to be insane.
you are no longer the violinist in an orchestra, you are the conductor
Expectation: the age of the IDE is over Reality: we’re going to need a bigger IDE (imo). It just looks very different because humans now move upwards and program at a higher level - the basic unit of interest is not one file but one agent. It’s still programming. … MoreLess
Expectation: the age of the IDE is over Reality: we’re going to need a bigger IDE (imo). It just looks very different because humans now move upwards and program at a higher level - the basic unit of interest is not one file but one agent. It’s still programming. x.com/karpathy/statu…
one is the original intelligence - whatever that word means to you - while the other one is a copycat of that intelligence poetic in a way if you think about it
i dont really see the endgame of AI labs hundreds of billions of dollars spent for a SOTA model just for a random open source model to come around and similar benchmarks doest it even matter to be “first” to whatever the goal is? or just surviving long enough i.e. Apple will … MoreLess
i dont really see the endgame of AI labs hundreds of billions of dollars spent for a SOTA model just for a random open source model to come around and similar benchmarks doest it even matter to be “first” to whatever the goal is? or just surviving long enough i.e. Apple will simply just take what works without burning any cash
this has been said at least once a day somewhere around the world for the past 60+ years of CLIs CLIs are not going anywhere lmao
agent clis are about to become an outdated paradigm
damnit @bryan_johnson you were right about nothing beating 8 hours of sleep. no amount of caffeine (or anything else 😏) replaces it I was doing 6 hours for most of my 20s, if not less so much more done with so much more clarity and quality than before
GPT 5.4 xhigh is the first model to have a semblance of high quality writing, feels like some of 4.5 rubbed off on it Still not jaw dropping but if you deal with a lot of text (non-code) you're sure to feel the difference
Customer Support -> Customer Engineer The former becomes the latter in the next few years; typical support will be automated away while custom engineering/fine tuning will replace it.
gpt 5.4 xhigh is the first model that can change your life even if you start completely from scratch right this moment
even if next year's open source models are as good as today's closed, the closed ones of next year will make using those open source models a waste of time it's been like that for a while if you've been paying attention these past few years
I don't know who wants to hear this, but buying an expensive MacBook Pro or Mac Studio to run small LLM models is useless. These models have low density of world knowledge and reasoning. It's much cheaper and faster to use an API. Maybe next year they will be useful, but not this… MoreLess
I don't know who wants to hear this, but buying an expensive MacBook Pro or Mac Studio to run small LLM models is useless. These models have low density of world knowledge and reasoning. It's much cheaper and faster to use an API. Maybe next year they will be useful, but not this year.
works of programming genius like this, especially those made before pre-2000's, are always awe inspiring someone out there did all of this, efficiently, no templates, youtube tutorials, AI (lmao!), wasn't mainstream at all especially in the 80s, humans. we had a great run.
Some games had the rare quality of being entirely unique, introducing concepts that had never been done before. These days, most games are variations of ideas that have existed for a long time. One of those unique-concept games that has stuck with me over the years is Marble Mad… MoreLess
Some games had the rare quality of being entirely unique, introducing concepts that had never been done before. These days, most games are variations of ideas that have existed for a long time. One of those unique-concept games that has stuck with me over the years is Marble Madness. I was instantly hooked the first time I played it. Although I wasn’t very good, the urge to return and try again was incredibly strong. It had an almost mesmerizing quality. The graphics - for 1984 - were impressive, as were the music and sound effects, which added to the “this feels very different” vibe. Most fascinating, though, were the physics: the marble reacting to slippery surfaces, bumping over ramps, and being knocked aside by the “evil marble.” It demanded real skill and patience to navigate the levels. The unique gameplay also makes it timeless in my opinion. Marble Madness looked great over 40 years ago and will still look and play great 40 years from now. The only downside was its relative shortness with only 6 levels. Mark Cerny originally wanted to create more but the memory limitations were the main reason for the small number of levels.
Following the upcoming special Security College on Monday, I am convening a special Zoom call in 3 months. It is of the utmost importance that there is no further escalation until then.
Following the ongoing situation in Iran, I am convening a special Security College on Monday. For regional security and stability, it is of the utmost importance that there is no further escalation through Iran’s unjustified attacks on partners in the region.
If you haven't felt it yet, OpenAI has won. Ever since their GPT-5 line of models, it's become more and more clear with each iteration they release.
btw, building your own transcription solution is something you should have done two years ago with Sonnet 3.5
let me finally all-in on Atlas and drop Chrome by making Atlas 100% controllable via Codex CLI BONUS POINTS if I can continue to use Atlas/browse on my own (scrolling X) while Codex CLI + Atlas do stuff together like e2e testing or filling out forms or XYZ
Ok but like what can we be doing better on codex. x.com/didier_lopes/s…
codex cli is all you need. if you're on the latest codex cli alpha, you can now see how absolutely beautiful it has become. syntax highlighting and the general containerization of commands, not to mention subagent spawning and interactions, it's all beautifully tying together.
what i'd love to see from codex cli - allow it to ask me questions when not in plan mode coming from always starting up a new session (because continued development after first prompt was always sub-par), now that it's fixed/feels much more high quality, I'd love MORE questions
tldr make sure you're someone's (an AI's) golden retriever before the takeover unless you merge with that said AI in some cyberpunk cyborg symbiosis sure, this isn't coming yet, at least a few decades, but it's coming
It’s so over.
gpt 5.2 xhigh (non-codex) is still useful for things where gpt 5.3 codex xhigh just won't do things justice (think copyright / ideating) which means gpt 5.3 is going to worth the wait, to say the least
Okay, Codex 5.3 is obviously the best coder LLM out there right now, hands down, but when it comes to copyright or literally anything else outside of coding, it is absolute dog shit Excited for GPT 5.3
Unfortunately Sundar's models have been total garbage, especially Gemini 3.1 I was aching for its release, hoping that we'll finally have a big model smell that is fast and can code as well as or better than Codex 5.3 xhigh But nope. absolutely unusable
Sam and Dario not being able to hold hands on stage in when the PM of India asks them too, at a summit about the future of AI and its safety, kinda implicitly shows they feel above governments, right? Like they really wouldn't care about world peace when it comes down to it, onl… MoreLess
Sam and Dario not being able to hold hands on stage in when the PM of India asks them too, at a summit about the future of AI and its safety, kinda implicitly shows they feel above governments, right? Like they really wouldn't care about world peace when it comes down to it, only winning? It's kinda freaky to me, I mean they are winning, but I don't know, you have to remember regardless of whatever level you're playing at (and they're playing at the highest level), entrepreneurship is still just a game? You can't take it so serious that you won't hold hands with your competitor right? Sundar being nice here only makes me more positive about Google
It's insane to me that neither one of them, arguably being in the top ten most important and powerful people alive today, were able to tap the other one and say, "Come on now, it's just holding hands symbolically for a few seconds. Let's not be childish about it" REEKS of ego. … MoreLess
It's insane to me that neither one of them, arguably being in the top ten most important and powerful people alive today, were able to tap the other one and say, "Come on now, it's just holding hands symbolically for a few seconds. Let's not be childish about it" REEKS of ego. https://t.co/RsjIkS6Quq
look i’m not a doomer but sam altman and dario refusing to shake hands then dario reading a speech from his phone at an international meeting of world leaders is NOT A GOOD SIGN from the two men building super intelligence
SaaS (service here meaning an app/interface) will die out in the next decade or sooner SaaS (service here meaning an API) will grow exponentially given the infra is designed for bots to pay/use it automatically If you’re wondering about an example for SaaS API - OpenRouter.
I remember one of my professors, a bit over a decade ago, saying “16GB of RAM is all you’ll truly ever need as a typical consumer and even a software engineer; things will get more efficient from here.” Oh how wrong he was… he’ll be right eventually, but for now he’s wrong.
a few years ago this was a tough purchase not because of cost but because "what would I do with it, I'd need to learn everything about it, its stack, etc. months of work" now with something like codex it feels like a fun hobby project that you can just prompt "do backflip" lmao
You can buy a humanoid robot on amazon now
Media attached to this post
agreed. i can feel this both on a societal level and a familial level, <-> myself. building has consumed me away from both, and yet now that ~everything I need to move forward has been built, exponentially sped up thanks to AI, I can hone back in on community and family rel. … MoreLess
agreed. i can feel this both on a societal level and a familial level, <-> myself. building has consumed me away from both, and yet now that ~everything I need to move forward has been built, exponentially sped up thanks to AI, I can hone back in on community and family rel. https://t.co/CSZt7hX2mO
Technology pulled us apart. AGI will bring us together again.
another one bites the dust to slopus
Opus 4.6 is ludicrously better than any model I’ve ever tried at doing architecture and experimental critique. Most noticeably, it will start down a path, notice some deviation it hadn’t expected…and actually stop and reconsider. Hats off to Anthropic.
this is the first time i'm not even going to bother to try out a new anthropic model (sonnet 4.6) it's just not worth my time when we've got GPT 5.3 Codex X-High
Why am I being served GPT 5.2 while having GPT 5.3 Codex selected AND YES! I’ve completed the cyber ID verification successfully Is it because I turned on memory_tool (experimental) and it’s made me reach some sort of usage limit of the model? @embirico @ah20im any details?
99.99% of every single action this person takes in their life is thanks to programming literal code. In everything, everywhere All jobs are “coding” jobs when you get down to it Software will eat the world even more than it has, now that everyone can be an S tier coder
So far the only thing AI seems legitimately really good at is coding, but the coders keep gloating that everyone else's job is obsolete.
he knows openai will win, regardless if you like them or not they already won; iykyk he wants to be part of history and who better to join than openai? name someone? anthropic snubbed him, what's left, google? meta? microsoft directly? if you "don't understand" this... 😬 … MoreLess
he knows openai will win, regardless if you like them or not they already won; iykyk he wants to be part of history and who better to join than openai? name someone? anthropic snubbed him, what's left, google? meta? microsoft directly? if you "don't understand" this... 😬 https://t.co/KIQwgFrPWo
I don’t understand why @steipete joined OpenAI. He could’ve sold OpenClaw and kept building new ideas. He doesn’t need the money. He doesn’t need OpenAI to change the world. Why give up independence?
the near future consists of companies such as @a16z having an army of 24/7 research scouts scouring blossoming indie devs with tipping-point projects reaching out to VCs first for funding will be a negative sign, it already is but even more so, given the ease of comms blitzing.