Posts on X before Apr 16, 2026, 2:31:32 PM UTC
every time I upgrade to the next latest/alpha of Codex I am shocked that auto-titling is still not a thing
seems like a no brainer especially with 5.3 spark
@ah20im @thsottiaux pls, m'lords 🥺
I've seen at this point hundreds of Anthropic accounts banned
Yet to see an OpenAI account get banned
EVERY DAY, BABY.
you've GOT to be kidding me
i was just about to sleep
still going to sleep but damn it now i'll ponder what sharp edges to test for tomorrow
brother I JUST installed into 0.121 stable
and 10 minutes later we've got a new alpha. God Bless
2020's are for ~solving intelligence labor,
2030's are for ~solving physical labor (robotics)
no one can predict what 2040's will look like because of these two reasons;
it clears out two pillars of what defines humanity, our advantage as a species
long ways til then, though!
HUGE for so many companies.
So excited for these next years,
further exciting me for what things will look like by 2030.
FINALLY.
reminder that the only reason the left and right panels exist is because of context switching and result verification
both are solveable
so we'll end up with only the middle part, nothing else
aka we'll just talk to a single interface and everything else is to be solved for
LOL but many such cases going on rn
you'll see this pivot countless more times this year
the only reason you should have /fast mode on in codex is if you're running massive parallel runs and speed truly does matter because it blocks your main agent from continuing
5.4 xhigh has gotten SO FAST on default speed that using /fast is just burning your money/usage
first part is true
last part is wrong when it comes to what is to be meant by spot
no one can catch up to openai
every day the gap widens
the race is over
has been since 2025
last few months just confirms it
if you're a brand new startup and you're not building for agents first, you're ngmi unfortunately
i agree with this in theory but the reality is that it's unsalvageable if your focus becomes "lets re-educate everyone on why ai is actually good / lets do charity / lets show how good we are"
masses have already decided AI = BAD and the only way to stop increasing tragedy is ..
unfortunately, this backlash has turned violent much faster than expected time is running out for technology leaders to show they care about the public benefit above all else slow down your layoffs. invest in re-education. mentor the next generation. we're all on team humanity … Less
unfortunately, this backlash has turned violent much faster than expected time is running out for technology leaders to show they care about the public benefit above all else slow down your layoffs. invest in re-education. mentor the next generation. we're all on team humanity x.com/AnjneyMidha/st…
If he feels like this about Opus 4.6,
wait until he finds out about GPT 5.4 xhigh
PEN SECURED
tyvm
Much better than not releasing a model because "it's way too dangerous; we're all still using it within our company though; we're also giving it to certain friends and organizations"
Give everyone The Ring, else those select few will surely find ways to reason not to
Sam++
interesting how all the people that have thus far called AI useless, waste of time, autofill, etc -
now in a single day they switched their tune re. AI hatred to "look at how bad it is {bad now being used as evil here instead of 'quality' bad}, this is going to cause ruin"...
amazing post for so many reasons:
- this has been true up until mythos
- because this has been true, and those instances are surely now part of the world view of mythos,
- mythos now does this canonically without needing that directional nudge of the past
misAnthropic as always
I mean, we all understood this was going to happen right?
they've finally created the seed of a psuedo-god that does their bidding, literally grants them unlimited wishes in anything near proximity and within the virtual world, ...
and you think they will sell it to you ASAP?
by that time they'll have an npm package called 'mythos-patch', you run it, it oneshots your entire repo/monorepo into impenetrability
Okay so Anthropic's Claude Mythos is so good they are sharing it with big companies so they can patch vulnerabilities before releasing it to general public? Who will give me my 15 days to safely fix vulnerabilities in my apps which Mythos will expose to everyone? Chat, are we c… Less
Okay so Anthropic's Claude Mythos is so good they are sharing it with big companies so they can patch vulnerabilities before releasing it to general public? Who will give me my 15 days to safely fix vulnerabilities in my apps which Mythos will expose to everyone? Chat, are we cooked?
gpt 4.5 is a bad example here because it was useless other than for some half decent prose upside for slopwriters
again, if this mythos model measures up to even half of what is being shown it's capable of, price does not matter here
Anthropic: "We do not plan to make Claude Mythos Preview generally available" A big line, buried quite deep. Possible reasons? So many, inc: 1) The model is expensive (25/125), not far off GPT 4.5, which became commercially unviable. Less likely, given the claims about Mythos… Less
Anthropic: "We do not plan to make Claude Mythos Preview generally available" A big line, buried quite deep. Possible reasons? So many, inc: 1) The model is expensive (25/125), not far off GPT 4.5, which became commercially unviable. Less likely, given the claims about Mythos. 2) They genuinely are worried about unleashing cybersecurity choas on the world. 3) They don't have capacity to serve it at scale yet. 4) They will quickly distil the early access outputs of Mythos into a lighter model, so no need to release the bigger model when a more cost efficient one coming imminently. 5) Other. Not read the 250 page report yet, but will do.
I love this joke every time a new model comes around with "muh security!!!" essays and ID verification walls
but if you've been paying attention, this one is different
people already forgot about Opus original pricing
$25/$125 is more than welcome even if the benchmarks are half as good of an upgrade as they claim x.com/flavioAd/statu…
And just like that, everything is being ~solved in 2026
>Anthropic's Mythos ~solving code generation
>OpenAI's ImageGen v2 ~solving image generation
>Seedance 2 / Veo 4 ~solving video generation
>ElevenLabs v3 ~solving voice/effect generation
>Sora v5.5 ~solving music generation
So @TimJDillon could make a full podcast episode every single day instead of per week, and it STILL wouldn't be enough to cover what's been going on/what's going to happen next
so cool to see people finding out about modafinil/armodafinil, l-theanine, etc
i wonder how much longer until they find out about piracetam, oxiracetam, nootropics in general
really takes me back ~15 years ago when i was in high school buying all this stuff online lmao
it's nice to see trading going in this direction.
web + mobile, tradingview, market data, trade copiers, marketplace, multi-prop support, one login. feels like a much more complete direction for the space.
sean's post: linkedin.com/posts/seanrkoz…
if you're not spending your time upgrading your repos/your clients' repos to be less and less dependent on... dependencies, you're ngmi (nor will your clients)
every single package is an attack vector ESPECIALLY when today's agents are so trigger happy with updating to latest
TeamPCP has done ANOTHER supply chain attack. My Brother in Christ, how many of these fuckin' things are you going to do? YOU'VE DONE 50 FUCKING SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACKS. 50 SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACKS IN EIGHT FUCKING DAYS. March 19th: - Trivy March 20th: - EmilGroup (28 packages) - Ope… Less
TeamPCP has done ANOTHER supply chain attack. My Brother in Christ, how many of these fuckin' things are you going to do? YOU'VE DONE 50 FUCKING SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACKS. 50 SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACKS IN EIGHT FUCKING DAYS. March 19th: - Trivy March 20th: - EmilGroup (28 packages) - OpenGov (16 packages) - Teale-io (eslint-config) - AIRTM (uuid-base32) - PypeSteam (floating-ui-dom) March 23rd: - Checkmarx March 24th: - LiteLLM March 27th: - Telnyx
this is the state of google rn vs <1s in my terminal
can you find the answer on the entirety of the google page?
alright my prediction was for 2027 but it is increasingly looking like 2026 is the last year using dependencies is a good idea
if you're making serious software rn, the worst investment you can make is dependencies
should be obvious but: - anthropic is going all in on next model due to breakthrough; every bit of compute is precious; short term loss (lowering usage) for long term gain (quicker to the next level of models) - openai is going all in on the next model due to breakthrough; wipe… Less
should be obvious but:
- anthropic is going all in on next model due to breakthrough; every bit of compute is precious; short term loss (lowering usage) for long term gain (quicker to the next level of models)
- openai is going all in on the next model due to breakthrough; wipes sora completely out and uses absolutely everything towards the next gen of models
2026 is the takeoff even normies will feel, iykyk
to help you understand the current situation of AI, specifically LLMs, this is all you need to grasp really:
disney is just a lil bro to OpenAI
dependencies are a thing of the past soon imo
especially with what happened with litellm
maybe EOY 2027 it will be mainstream
the for you page is absolute garbage again @nikitabier
- WHY are my likes not weighed?
- WHY are my bookmarks not weighed?
you always take a look at people's accounts, right, so take a look at mine - my likes, bookmarks - and tell me, WHY does my For You look like it does?
for those saying that medium/high reasoning performs better than xhigh reasoning, it's easier to correct mistakes due to overthinking than to correct mistakes due to not being diligent enough in the research/plan process it almost feels like medium/high have a hidden prompt "ju… Less
for those saying that medium/high reasoning performs better than xhigh reasoning,
it's easier to correct mistakes due to overthinking than to correct mistakes due to not being diligent enough in the research/plan process
it almost feels like medium/high have a hidden prompt "just do this ASAP for the user, wing it". that's what those reasoning levels feel like in comparison
one of many things that keep me going and smiling at the start of every day:
- knowing that i haven't yet unlocked this skill tree (hardware)
- it gives me perspective on how non-software people view my work (by how I, a non-hardware person, view this type of work)
currently the only proven way is to first rip out entirely what you are wanting to refactor, then make a new session, and tell the new agent what you want to implement
now you also need to make sure that your memories have no mention of that ripped out feature as well
oh look, a dir that shows what companies to invest in because of how early they are to the latest bleeding edge tech of the future skills.sh/official
no one is sharing, it hasn't been able to keep up, and now that gap will widen exponentially
the best they can do is imitation of these models
systems complexity should come from the system, not the AI set up
put harnesses and blockades up for your runs, not your agents
pi was already so super fast, now it's blazing away with the parallel tool calls executing simultaneously, amazing stuff @badlogicgames
friendly reminder, Q1 2026 hasn't even ended yet
if you think the field is unrecognizable since December (which if you don't feel that, you're not pushing hard enough/up to date)...
just know it hasn't even been a full 3 months since then
imagine 9 months (EOY). lmao buckle up
soon, salary is going to matter a lot less than your ITB (individual token budget)
working for $250k with a $1m token budget per year will be leagues more fun/growing than even $500k but needing to beg for tokens
this is already the case at the top of the competition
the problem with this tweet is that if anyone else said this we'd all laugh
but it's elon we're talking about here
most will still laugh, sure, although that laughter is now nervous laughter rather than making-fun-of laughter
if you haven't realized the below statement after seeing what @karpathy and @tobi have done just this past week or so,
you're ngmi :(
it's the first model to refer to itself constantly as "model", as in,
"model thinks xyz. model thinks that's good idea and something to explore. model thinks this is a benchmark and will tryhard."
