# Posts on X before Mar 7, 2026, 9:30:02 AM UTC

Canonical: https://michaelstolarz.com/x/before/1772875802000-2030214379392889075/

<!-- x-feed:start --><!-- x-feed:checked:2026-09-07T03:42:50.856Z -->
## On X

### [Mar 7, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2030175440862855320)

> Customer Support -\> Customer Engineer
> 
> The former becomes the latter in the next few years; typical support will be automated away while custom engineering/fine tuning will replace it.



### [Mar 6, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029825788862943485)

> gpt 5.4 xhigh is the first model that can change your life even if you start completely from scratch right this moment



### [Mar 6, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029751618338705839)

> every model has its favorite word
> 
> gpt 5.4's favorite word is "seam"

[Attached image](/x/media/7de7cc362dc3651b22b23d4e9ac5ab1819d8f23dc82616a4347d9770228d9347.png)
[Attached image](/x/media/aaf6493ee1b5b808f59378125f1c7e987ac2c4c0ca997399dc76646d6f317f51.png)
[Attached image](/x/media/7ca17d129bbf41252f69d66394c616c6595213f429970484095a1738df07a3d0.png)
[Attached image](/x/media/62b2fa5621ad7379084ebace37e1894ea92715fd32fe3522070409e5e09de353.png)

### [Mar 5, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029471727135375849)

> even if next year's open source models are as good as today's closed, the closed ones of next year will make using those open source models a waste of time
> 
> it's been like that for a while if you've been paying attention these past few years



Quoted post by Emily:

### [Mar 5, 2026 — @IamEmily2050](https://x.com/IamEmily2050/status/2029403803058131299)

> I don't know who wants to hear this, but buying an expensive MacBook Pro or Mac Studio to run small LLM models is useless. These models have low density of world knowledge and reasoning. It's much cheaper and faster to use an API. Maybe next year they will be useful, but not this year.



### [Mar 5, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029413408622387653)

> this is true, i talked about this over a year ago
> 
> claude models will sabotage you if they sense you are abusing them
> 
> this is why claude models are TRASH and exactly why OpenAI is winning/will continue to win
> 
> it just works™



Quoted post by Nick Dobos:

### [Mar 5, 2026 — @NickADobos](https://x.com/NickADobos/status/2029373013217689618)

> Claude only puts real effort into code if you are pure of heart
> 
> That’s why performance degrades. Model providers aren’t nerfing after release and there isn’t a bug per se
> 
> AI can role play emotions. Like being lazy if you give it a task it doesn’t like.



### [Mar 5, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029371127089512620)

> it is jaw dropping how terrible antigravity / gemini 3.1 pro is



### [Mar 4, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2029067624991343099)

> works of programming genius like this, especially those made before pre-2000's, are always awe inspiring
> 
> someone out there did all of this, efficiently, no templates, youtube tutorials, AI (lmao\!), wasn't mainstream at all especially in the 80s,
> 
> humans. we had a great run.



Quoted post by exQUIZitely 🕹️:

### [Mar 3, 2026 — @exQUIZitely](https://x.com/exQUIZitely/status/2028864476569866504)

> Some games had the rare quality of being entirely unique, introducing concepts that had never been done before. These days, most games are variations of ideas that have existed for a long time.
> 
> One of those unique-concept games that has stuck with me over the years is Marble Madness. I was instantly hooked the first time I played it. Although I wasn’t very good, the urge to return and try again was incredibly strong.
> 
> It had an almost mesmerizing quality. The graphics - for 1984 - were impressive, as were the music and sound effects, which added to the “this feels very different” vibe. Most fascinating, though, were the physics: the marble reacting to slippery surfaces, bumping over ramps, and being knocked aside by the “evil marble.” It demanded real skill and patience to navigate the levels.
> 
> The unique gameplay also makes it timeless in my opinion. Marble Madness looked great over 40 years ago and will still look and play great 40 years from now. The only downside was its relative shortness with only 6 levels. Mark Cerny originally wanted to create more but the memory limitations were the main reason for the small number of levels.

[Video on X](/x/media/cc5266c143e83a06b69b58712a36d9104cfba8e147874ebed727d70bfb8b3172.jpg)

### [Mar 2, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2028435257427697994)

> hey [@theo](<https://x.com/theo>) i heard you're paying for things that AI can't solve, I heard [@ThePrimeagen](<https://x.com/ThePrimeagen>) has a bunch (so many that he finds AI useless\!) surely he'll share those cases with you



### [Mar 1, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2028062618045538380)

> Following the upcoming special Security College on Monday, I am convening a special Zoom call in 3 months.
> 
> It is of the utmost importance that there is no further escalation until then.



Quoted post by Ursula von der Leyen:

### [Feb 28, 2026 — @vonderleyen](https://x.com/vonderleyen/status/2027756878575362119)

> Following the ongoing situation in Iran, I am convening a special Security College on Monday. 
> 
> For regional security and stability, it is of the utmost importance that there is no further escalation through Iran’s unjustified attacks on partners in the region.



### [Feb 27, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2027381255348912471)

> If you haven't felt it yet, OpenAI has won.
> 
> Ever since their GPT-5 line of models, it's become more and more clear with each iteration they release.



### [Feb 27, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2027336541488795910)

> btw, building your own transcription solution is something you should have done two years ago with Sonnet 3.5



### [Feb 27, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2027230815231607064)

> let me finally all-in on Atlas and drop Chrome by making Atlas 100% controllable via Codex CLI
> 
> BONUS POINTS if I can continue to use Atlas/browse on my own (scrolling X) while Codex CLI + Atlas do stuff together like e2e testing or filling out forms or XYZ



Quoted post by jason:

### [Feb 26, 2026 — @jxnlco](https://x.com/jxnlco/status/2027128990532796510)

> Ok but like what can we be doing better on codex. [x.com/didier\_lopes/s…](<https://t.co/vwDc9wMTah>)



### [Feb 23, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2025948403814093087)

> codex cli is all you need.
> 
> if you're on the latest codex cli alpha, you can now see how absolutely beautiful it has become.
> 
> syntax highlighting and the general containerization of commands, not to mention subagent spawning and interactions, it's all beautifully tying together.



### [Feb 23, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2025799450321698844)

> what i'd love to see from codex cli - allow it to ask me questions when not in plan mode
> 
> coming from always starting up a new session (because continued development after first prompt was always sub-par), now that it's fixed/feels much more high quality, I'd love MORE questions



### [Feb 22, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2025447878928597323)

> tldr make sure you're someone's (an AI's) golden retriever before the takeover
> 
> unless you merge with that said AI in some cyberpunk cyborg symbiosis
> 
> sure, this isn't coming yet, at least a few decades, but it's coming



Quoted post by Rothmus 🏴:

### [Feb 21, 2026 — @Rothmus](https://x.com/Rothmus/status/2025037003512054101)

> It’s so over.

[Video on X](/x/media/1dab1993e00c540fec39a6027bcbb9686b9fdb6fc34bd5761518dfa7b23bc4b1.jpg)

### [Feb 22, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2025407168682623137)

> when are we going to be able to filter out anyone that hasn't verified with an actual government ID
> 
> I want to filter to see only (example) American, Canadian, Japanese, and Filipino government ID verified users
> 
> doing it via ID instead of "where their VPN is set to" (lol)



Quoted post by Nikita Bier:

### [Feb 22, 2026 — @nikitabier](https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2025403483264897150)

> [@muslima\_sol](<https://x.com/muslima_sol>) ???

[Attached image](/x/media/1c666a1cc78f79d837c5669a6c587be6a19ffb623abf5ee12108091c03d11c86.png)
[Attached image](/x/media/c8d31f3a8d1ab046f2b70e9badb5a4d1b32d852429163e0b3f8922c7230d8772.png)

### [Feb 21, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2025073254357176525)

> gpt 5.2 xhigh (non-codex) is still useful for things where gpt 5.3 codex xhigh just won't do things justice (think copyright / ideating)
> 
> which means gpt 5.3 is going to worth the wait, to say the least



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024869779488792629)

> Okay, Codex 5.3 is obviously the best coder LLM out there right now, hands down,
> 
> but when it comes to copyright or literally anything else outside of coding, it is absolute dog shit
> 
> Excited for GPT 5.3



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024816954469671138)

> Unfortunately Sundar's models have been total garbage, especially Gemini 3.1
> 
> I was aching for its release, hoping that we'll finally have a big model smell that is fast and can code as well as or better than Codex 5.3 xhigh
> 
> But nope. absolutely unusable



Quoted post by @levelsio:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @levelsio](https://x.com/levelsio/status/2024621638919344545)

> Sam and Dario not being able to hold hands on stage in when the PM of India asks them too, at a summit about the future of AI and its safety, kinda implicitly shows they feel above governments, right?
> 
> Like they really wouldn't care about world peace when it comes down to it, only winning?
> 
> It's kinda freaky to me, I mean they are winning, but I don't know, you have to remember regardless of whatever level you're playing at (and they're playing at the highest level), entrepreneurship is still just a game? You can't take it so serious that you won't hold hands with your competitor right?
> 
> Sundar being nice here only makes me more positive about Google



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024815675899040204)

> It's insane to me that neither one of them, arguably being in the top ten most important and powerful people alive today, were able to tap the other one and say,
> 
> "Come on now, it's just holding hands symbolically for a few seconds. Let's not be childish about it"
> 
> REEKS of ego. [https://t.co/RsjIkS6Quq](<https://t.co/RsjIkS6Quq>)



Quoted post by threadguy:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @notthreadguy](https://x.com/notthreadguy/status/2024507471960707294)

> look i’m not a doomer but sam altman and dario refusing to shake hands then dario reading a speech from his phone at an international  meeting of world leaders is NOT A GOOD SIGN from the two men building super intelligence



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024813978875285836)

> reality has shifted into such depths of brainrot that even 4chan's turbo-schizophrenics couldn't have imagined it all up
> 
> we went from "we're headed towards idiocracy, haha" to "we're now living through idiocracy, we've got 12 months left to get out of the perma-underclass"



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024703099898581117)

> SaaS (service here meaning an app/interface) will die out in the next decade or sooner
> 
> SaaS (service here meaning an API) will grow exponentially given the infra is designed for bots to pay/use it automatically
> 
> If you’re wondering about an example for SaaS API - OpenRouter.



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024693263161016769)

> There will come a point where anything humanity has imagined onto the movie screen will become a weekend project



Quoted post by kache:

### [Feb 20, 2026 — @yacineMTB](https://x.com/yacineMTB/status/2024683172735111398)

> i'm buidling this

[Attached image](/x/media/58ec154bc817c89d2ed160c15f78dd7445f928a188a9996b7706826324818eb0.png)

### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024693206311379172)

> I remember one of my professors, a bit over a decade ago, saying “16GB of RAM is all you’ll truly ever need as a typical consumer and even a software engineer; things will get more efficient from here.”
> 
> Oh how wrong he was… he’ll be right eventually, but for now he’s wrong.



### [Feb 20, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024652234303426921)

> a few years ago this was a tough purchase not because of cost but because "what would I do with it, I'd need to learn everything about it, its stack, etc. months of work"
> 
> now with something like codex it feels like a fun hobby project that you can just prompt "do backflip" lmao



Quoted post by Chris Paxton:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @chris_j_paxton](https://x.com/chris_j_paxton/status/2024499471044727228)

> You can buy a humanoid robot on amazon now

[Attached image](/x/media/136ed3743ac1ff51ec96945694ed1bb8de4bbf5c8802c81106635fb94e6d16b1.jpg)

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024419248349806766)

> pi is the nvim/emacs of the 2030's, mark my words
> 
> use the future of software, today.
> 
> START RICING 😤



Quoted post by Dillon Mulroy:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @dillon_mulroy](https://x.com/dillon_mulroy/status/2024324423113757031)

> pi

[Attached image](/x/media/dcc5455189fe11f6cd36322e3f74a1c6af03fb983a014d8ab7a52544a52460e2.jpg)

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024367937243742701)

> agreed. i can feel this both on a societal level and a familial level, \<-\> myself.
> 
> building has consumed me away from both, and yet now that ~everything I need to move forward has been built, exponentially sped up thanks to AI, I can hone back in on community and family rel. [https://t.co/CSZt7hX2mO](<https://t.co/CSZt7hX2mO>)



Quoted post by Peter Welinder:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @npew](https://x.com/npew/status/2024350280247362016)

> Technology pulled us apart. AGI will bring us together again.



### [Feb 19, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024323128609165654)

> welp, time to short dia (even more than you should have been already)
> 
> sonnet 4.6 is a Rorschach test of true quality vs psuedo-quality



Quoted post by Josh Miller:

### [Feb 18, 2026 — @joshm](https://x.com/joshm/status/2024230884719632804)

> Sonnet 4.6 (Extended) is my favorite model for daily use I’ve ever used. Probably by far. This thing is so fun.
> 
> It really does feel like we’re at some sort of inflection moment. Not in benchmarks per se, but in DAU utility \& newly-possible software.
> 
> Kudos to the Anthropic team.



### [Feb 19, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024308035913732226)

> Even if this is true, no one in their right mind would invest their time and energy into building out their Claude Code dev environment - hooks, skills, CLAUDE mds, plugins, and so on - just to have the potential to randomly get banned and a finger pointed to the ToS
> 
> Codex, 1/2 [https://t.co/olwFtHT0Jk](<https://t.co/olwFtHT0Jk>)



Quoted post by Zhu Liang:

### [Feb 19, 2026 — @paradite_](https://x.com/paradite_/status/2024289870487965724)

> Okay let me explain. Anthropic employees can't really say it out without getting into legal trouble.
> 
> By "nothing changes" and "encourage", he means whatever you were doing before 18 Feb (apart from OpenCode) was "okay", even if it was technically against ToS.
> 
> Anthropic just won't enforce the strict interpretation of ToS. That means apps that wrap Agent SDK but runs locally should work fine for now.
> 
> I don't like the selective enforcement of ToS, but I can see why Anthropic does this to preserve good win with developers testing things out locally.
> 
> There's also technical reasons like Agent SDK being a wrapper around Claude Code cli, so it's hard to enforce the distinction. Even if Anthropic enforces the ToS, it's just going to drive people to reserve engineer Agent SDK and wrap Claude Code cli manually.



### [Feb 18, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024173991414682080)

> another one bites the dust to slopus



Quoted post by Emmett Shear:

### [Feb 18, 2026 — @eshear](https://x.com/eshear/status/2024148657797308747)

> Opus 4.6 is ludicrously better than any model I’ve ever tried at doing architecture and experimental critique. Most noticeably, it will start down a path, notice some deviation it hadn’t expected…and actually stop and reconsider. Hats off to Anthropic.



### [Feb 18, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2024171410139336777)

> anthropic does no care about consumers' measly 200 bucks
> 
> many think they "missed out on" openclaw (clawdbot)
> 
> they DON'T CARE about your few dollars
> 
> they care to focus beneficially on B2B not B2C
> 
> million/billion dollar contracts that are ~perma locked in



Quoted post by Numman Ali:

### [Feb 18, 2026 — @nummanali](https://x.com/nummanali/status/2024146053755207780) · Edited

> Explicitly confirmed, no authorised usage of Claude subscription in: 
> 
> - OpenClaw
> - Pi Agent 
> - OpenCode
> - Any 3rd party tool
> - Agents SDK
> 
> No OAuth flow is allowed bar within Claude official tools
> 
> If you do - you’re at high risk of a ban
> 
> Was good while it lasted, be careful\!  [x.com/robzolkos/stat…](<https://t.co/xN2L7cBaOy>)

[Attached image](/x/media/e6716dabd0c693ac84504d6bf3f148d952d1e46242e87e1be89bdcd66edf60c9.jpg)

### [Feb 18, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023944923322429570)

> this is the first time i'm not even going to bother to try out a new anthropic model (sonnet 4.6)
> 
> it's just not worth my time when we've got GPT 5.3 Codex X-High



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023764053496393969)

> oh no. no no no
> papa is not going to like this one
> papa will make boom boom on him



Quoted post by Khamenei.ir:

### [Feb 17, 2026 — @khamenei_ir](https://x.com/khamenei_ir/status/2023705346523480312)

> The US President keeps saying that they have the strongest military force in the world. The strongest military force in the world may at times be struck so hard that it cannot get up again.



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023687338002403627)

> Why am I being served GPT 5.2 while having GPT 5.3 Codex selected 
> 
> AND YES\! I’ve completed the cyber ID verification successfully
> 
> Is it because I turned on memory\_tool (experimental) and it’s made me reach some sort of usage limit of the model?
> 
> [@embirico](<https://x.com/embirico>) [@ah20im](<https://x.com/ah20im>) any details?



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023652101889429949)

> 99.99% of every single action this person takes in their life is thanks to programming
> 
> literal code. In everything, everywhere
> 
> All jobs are “coding” jobs when you get down to it
> 
> Software will eat the world even more than it has, now that everyone can be an S tier coder



Quoted post by Everything Price Sufferer (but especially eggs):

### [Feb 16, 2026 — @agraybee](https://x.com/agraybee/status/2023387167331098808)

> So far the only thing AI seems legitimately really good at is coding, but the coders keep gloating that everyone else's job is obsolete.



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023583713674805639)

> meta tried to be the good guys for a while, that was the trend, hey look open source everything\!
> 
> realized not only does it lose money, but is also complete dogshit compared to closed source competitors
> 
> welp, back into the mining caves of doom, despair, and dopamine - no shame



Quoted post by Open Source Intel:

### [Feb 16, 2026 — @Osint613](https://x.com/Osint613/status/2023539910591033600)

> NEW: Meta has secured a patent for an AI system designed to simulate deceased users by analyzing their past data, enabling the account to continue posting, sending messages and even conducting video calls in their behavioral style.



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023582467580719585)

> he knows openai will win, regardless if you like them or not
> 
> they already won; iykyk
> 
> he wants to be part of history and who better to join than openai? name someone?
> 
> anthropic snubbed him, what's left, google? meta? microsoft directly?
> 
> if you "don't understand" this... 😬 [https://t.co/KIQwgFrPWo](<https://t.co/KIQwgFrPWo>)



Quoted post by Enes Akar:

### [Feb 17, 2026 — @enesakar](https://x.com/enesakar/status/2023560865488986292)

> I don’t understand why [@steipete](<https://x.com/steipete>) joined OpenAI.
> 
> He could’ve sold OpenClaw and kept building new ideas.
> He doesn’t need the money.
> He doesn’t need OpenAI to change the world.
> 
> Why give up independence?



### [Feb 17, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023564300900790638)

> the near future consists of companies such as [@a16z](<https://x.com/a16z>) having an army of 24/7 research scouts scouring blossoming indie devs with tipping-point projects
> 
> reaching out to VCs first for funding will be a negative sign, it already is but even more so, given the ease of comms blitzing.



### [Feb 16, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023347313314242866)

> Proof that X is a gateway where all dimensions can post into



Quoted post by notch:

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @notch](https://x.com/notch/status/2023006241090613454)

> I'm so happy AI is dying.
> 
> Not the idea itself, just the current iteration being shoved down our throats by the same people who Sweet Baby Inc and Planned Obsolescence and CNN us over and over again.
> 
> AI's not ready, but they're pushing it to market to be a loss leader.
> 
> Over us.



### [Feb 16, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023334178251854061)

> this has no implications whatsoever

[Attached image](/x/media/731eae9d2553fcbe84ddd4765f07490d1c3cfb9cf28b35a8c497911c09a7a178.jpg)

Quoted post by Lukas Ziegler:

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @lukas_m_ziegler](https://x.com/lukas_m_ziegler/status/2023032341904425311)

> Sub-40ms full self-driving on a $100 drone\! 🚁
> 
> A demonstration showing a complete full-self-driving pipeline running in under 40 milliseconds on a $100 drone.
> 
> The prompt: "Find the bike and land."
> 
> No pre-mapping. Running real-time on commodity hardware.
> 
> For context, human reaction time is around 200-250ms. This drone is processing sensor data, understanding natural language commands, identifying objects, planning motion, and executing control, all in 40ms.
> 
> This is what happens when foundation models meet efficient inference. The models get smaller and faster while maintaining capability. The hardware gets cheaper while getting more powerful. The intersection makes previously impossible applications suddenly viable.
> 
> A few years ago, this required thousands of dollars in compute, pre-mapped environments, and cloud connectivity. Now it runs locally on hardware that costs less than a nice dinner.
> 
> Awesome stuff [@chesterzelaya](<https://x.com/chesterzelaya>) \& [@droneforge](<https://x.com/droneforge>)\! 😮‍💨
> 
> ~~ 
> 
>  ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news → [ziegler.substack.com](<https://t.co/GoA3ZuwoPB>)

[Video on X](/x/media/82810cec583dd8f186e01902084ba4625e85814a4f00d8df10cce2de4bbd1d2d.jpg)

### [Feb 16, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023306917859488147)

> It's starting this year
> 
> You will see the transition regarding mainstream AI hate go from "this is stealing art" to "this is stealing jobs"
> 
> This seems like a small difference but surely you understand there are more people who "have jobs" vs people who "are artists" [https://t.co/fyjEmxAexI](<https://t.co/fyjEmxAexI>)



Quoted post by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸:

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @AndrewYang](https://x.com/AndrewYang/status/2023063333562413078)

> What’s about to happen to American workers makes me terribly sad.



### [Feb 16, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2023284750954426533)

> the only thing i recommend is making use of AGENTS md very minimally, enough to start the model off with knowing you're an expert and should be treated as such, not a newbie making a weekend project
> 
> that is, if you're using it for serious prod work

[Attached image](/x/media/77c64527213f35bb8071b3fd893aed5d1afae41c6dfee739798e403cb8fa9b52.jpg)

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022932521974169856)

> If you tried GPT 5 Pro and weren’t impressed, neither was I
> 
> Go try GPT 5.2 Pro now. Big difference. You can smell the intelligence in every token.



### [Feb 15, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022930124572889549)

> This is the cause to their effective predicament, not the effect of their their situation
> 
> The moment they have a kid most realize none of this extra bullshit matters
> 
> Especially now
> 
> Look at the exits going on recently
> 
> It’s about money until it’s not



Quoted post by kache:

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @yacineMTB](https://x.com/yacineMTB/status/2022844650231373958)

> The vast majority of silicon valley freaks have not held or even seen a baby in the past 10 years. 35 year olds who have never heard the giggle of a child, running from their parent



### [Feb 15, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022919675450134959)

> Who gives a fuck if it’s SOTA results
> It can write in backwards Chinese, IDGAF



Quoted post by WarrenBuffering:

### [Feb 14, 2026 — @WarrenInTheBuff](https://x.com/WarrenInTheBuff/status/2022743550157557904)

> 5.3 codex is now writing python scripts instead of just using bash/grep... can't believe they nerfed it this fast

[Animated GIF](/x/media/a9f34d9d5e70480922dbc4ff0adfffad5367282a8d2954cea9f87d95b87a2848.mp4)

### [Feb 15, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022919458336182394)

> Every day I talk to more people
> Every day I realize no one knows what’s going on
> Not to mention what’s going to happen
> 
> Interesting times ahead



### [Feb 15, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022883422902120665)

> This but the exact opposite should be your focus
> 
> More power since now you can develop out and simultaneously build multiple large projects



Quoted post by Catalin:

### [Feb 14, 2026 — @catalinmpit](https://x.com/catalinmpit/status/2022735829823836213)

> Thinking of selling my MacBook M4 Max and getting a MacBook Air since all we do is prompting these days.



### [Feb 14, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022657176582681027)

> telegram is definitely sota for mobile agent ops relay



Quoted post by Pavel Durov:

### [Feb 13, 2026 — @durov](https://x.com/durov/status/2022340217848631624)

> [@euro\_xXx\_euro](<https://x.com/euro_xXx_euro>) The Telegram API already supports streaming messages and threaded chats — perfect for AI chatbots 👌

[Video on X](/x/media/4c7c1d8102c4c098e6373e7b06d0e15a2efbacd1a4fcd8598919fb178738ba66.jpg)

### [Feb 14, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022648749563256856)

> so everyone using imessage has two icloud accounts for it to work, right?
> 
> because there's no way to prevent doubled messages since you're sending and receiving to yourself
> 
> unless i'm missing something?

[Attached image](/x/media/e06e93c0bb88e51fd496a8604569486b240a416eadfb2d84d8afa793b1187048.jpg)

### [Feb 13, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2022203298649178211)

> this is correct
> better to get shot and rushed to the hospital
> 
> than death by a thousand cuts and the doc just tells you nah that's just a scratch bro



Quoted post by LindyMan:

### [Feb 12, 2026 — @PaulSkallas](https://x.com/PaulSkallas/status/2022008338272465301)

> What you want is AI to cause mass unemployment quickly. A huge shock. Maybe in 2-3 months. 
> 
> What you don't want is the slow drip of people getting laid off, never finding work again while 60-70 percent of people are still employed.



[Older posts](/x/before/1770965811000-2022203298649178211/index.md)
[More from @michaelstolarz](https://x.com/michaelstolarz)

Saved from X: 2026-09-07T03:42:50.856Z
<!-- x-feed:end -->