# Posts on X before Jan 9, 2026, 12:42:44 AM UTC Canonical: https://michaelstolarz.com/x/before/1767919364000-2009425572259352747/ ## On X ### [Jan 8, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2009163443824390586) > imagine, when there was a bug, you had to > > -follow through classes/funcs/files/dirs/defs > -actually read the code line by line > -think about what for foo in bar for xyz in abc > > WORST OF ALL, > > imagine you think you found the cause of the bug, rewrite xyz, go through the testing, compiling, run it to try it out and... > > nope, that wasn't it > > LOL Quoted post by Adam D'Angelo: ### [Jan 7, 2026 — @adamdangelo](https://x.com/adamdangelo/status/2008961539836186773) > i can't believe we used to write all this code by hand ### [Jan 8, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2009099821576229067) > I had plans to hire 2 this year to help me grow faster. > > Now I can confidently say I will never hire a software engineer ever in my life. > > Same applies to a personal (digital) assistant. A physical personal assistant is now much more worthy to me though. > > Same for anything related to graphics. > > The last bastion is ads/videos/viral content but I'm solving that (for my own niches ofc) this year. > > I don't think I'll ever hire anyone for a role that is digital in any sense. > > Maybe it will make things harder in the short term, but it will at the same time grow the management muscle that is the only thing left of which humans should still be in the loop for. > > Even that will go, sure, but it will be the last, I think. Quoted post by Sahil Lavingia: ### [Jan 8, 2026 — @shl](https://x.com/shl/status/2009075226399891660) > Some of the best software engineers are losing their jobs to AI ### [Jan 8, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2009067247298617530) > wrong. > > for every 1 anthropic vibe, openai can afford 3. > > so it's more like: > > OpenAI: (1) Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence, (2) we're doing ChatGPT Health, (3) we're doing ChatGPT social media app > > Anthropic: (1) Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence > > OpenAI: (1) Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence, (2) we're partnering with Instacart, (3) oh and put yourself next to your favorite Disney character in our videos and images\! > > Anthropic: (1) Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence Quoted post by Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀: ### [Jan 7, 2026 — @peterwildeford](https://x.com/peterwildeford/status/2009011404750176463) > Very different company vibes here... > > OpenAI: We're doing ChatGPT Health > Anthropic: Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence > OpenAI: We're doing ChatGPT social media app > Anthropic: Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence > OpenAI: We're partnering with Instacart\! > Anthropic: Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence > OpenAI: Put yourself next to your favorite Disney character in our videos and images\! > Anthropic: Our AI is imminently going to do recursive self-improvement to superintelligence ### [Jan 7, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2008855042301006315) > "cringe and gay" used to be a quick way of shutting something down without discourse on 4chan > > nowadays you can call (for example) a recent (2018+) tv show/movie "cringe and gay" and it's just fact instead of derogatory > > idk just smth interesting i noticed ### [Jan 7, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2008785231063704030) > I mean, let's be honest. This is the kind of shit that hasn't even been in futuristic movies. That's how you know that Boston Dynamics is gonna win. > > When your actual product is better than anything anyone could have ever imagined. Especially when it comes down to a product, in this case, a robot, which has seen the life of millions of storytellers' imaginations. That's how you know it's gonna be a winner. Quoted post by Simon Kalouche: ### [Jan 6, 2026 — @simonkalouche](https://x.com/simonkalouche/status/2008423470527639693) > Figure robot just pooped its pants. [Video on X](/x/media/02c1e35f585a8b5b400a3efb686332e41a2ae96606792cefa6d05dd28b8643d9.jpg) ### [Jan 6, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2008346698712838486) > TLDR is speed is practically solved before EOY Quoted post by Amir Salihefendić: ### [Jan 5, 2026 — @amix3k](https://x.com/amix3k/status/2008138477859148231) > Opus 4.5 is incredibly impressive, but it's still trained and served in the previous compute paradigm. > > In 2026: > - 1GW-class AI data centers start coming online from most frontier labs > - Frontier models trained end-to-end on Blackwell/GB200 start landing > > On Blackwell, NVIDIA reports ~3.2x faster training vs Hopper and up to 30x real-time inference for trillion-parameter LLMs. > > Worth keeping in mind as you plan for 2026. It's going to be wild\! 🤖🚀 ### [Jan 5, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2008198297488592962) > even though gpt 5.2 xhigh is smarter than opus 4.5, the speed difference makes it much more useful > > think of it like this - > > which would you prefer, 1 150IQ employee, or 10 125IQ employees? > > you can parallel run claude codes because you can juggle the mental context quickly since by the time you get to nth claude, the first ones have completed > > with codex, yeah sure you can run many in parallel, but their completion timings are so volatile AND long, so it's a double whammy when it comes to trying to "stay in the zone" > > though as usual, the moment opus 4.5 speed is achieved on the gpt 5.2 (xhigh\!) models, i'll be back on codex ### [Jan 5, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2008137075795865904) > …unless you have a polymarket bot running using claude opus 4.5 24/7 Quoted post by Robin Ebers: ### [Jan 5, 2026 — @robinebers](https://x.com/robinebers/status/2008086828755403073) > don't believe anyone claiming the claude max 5x plan is enough > > this is like the third time i'm hitting my session limits > > not the end of the world but definitely doable, frequently > > 20x will still feel unlimited to even the heaviest users though [Attached image](/x/media/f1f675445eeee006efa173641aa88387d4f3e59610ff1595641d9f01764df6e1.jpg) ### [Jan 4, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2007681101821817024) > this should put a smile on your face and remind you that it's not that you and I here are early - it's that things haven't even started yet for 99% of everyone else > > if you don't feel like your knowledge advantage is comparable to insider trading, then you either don't know enough or are not confident enough Quoted post by Sauers: ### [Jan 3, 2026 — @Sauers_](https://x.com/Sauers_/status/2007553303492866251) > I made a Reddit account and posted Greg Brockman saying Rust is "a perfect language for agents." This is on r/Rust. Do..... do they not know that AI can code now? I'm confused [Attached image](/x/media/3fd3345bb5b06be4895b02f352f950bab158f1fdacb95c2300267b9b81ede715.jpg) ### [Jan 4, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2007673944825008271) > if you can't smell the stench of Opus 4.5 that reeks off of this reddit post, > > your mental defenses are not up to par Quoted post by aditya: ### [Jan 3, 2026 — @adxtyahq](https://x.com/adxtyahq/status/2007440559091466287) > an Amazon SEV1 incident being handled like this feels unreal [Attached image](/x/media/83cadc14ad4ac1d7d64b8399027ed8681c1b44e76620cc87d523c42d2634dea2.png) ### [Jan 4, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2007620773675241761) > weirdly interesting to think that a select few people who grew up playing modern warfare 2 / halo when they were 10 years old... > > ...are now doing everything they played in those games, and more, in real life [https://t.co/Ox9krCh31f]() Quoted post by Visioner: ### [Jan 3, 2026 — @visionergeo](https://x.com/visionergeo/status/2007483999103672412) > ‼️‼️🇺🇸🇻🇪 BIG NEWS - The CIA quietly deployed officers to Venezuela beginning in August to monitor the movements and daily routines of President Nicolás Maduro, supporting broader U.S. intelligence operations, according to NYT. > > See the latest updates with us: [@visionergeo]() [Video on X](/x/media/5c10cc76a2abe91683147c5392ffe055738565b7927f2c1ad09a627b290a6f85.jpg) ### [Jan 4, 2026 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2007614608681644220) > 2025 was the year of wanting the most intelligent model > > 2026 feels like the year for speed now that all the frontier models' intelligence can do 99% of what people want ### [Dec 28, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2005299540812001333) > people are misunderstanding what "no juniors" means > > no HUMAN juniors. but juniors in general? more than ever. and they continuously learn as a hive mind > > no HUMAN seniors tomorrow, but tomorrow's seniors in general? > > more than ever, forever growing. Quoted post by amrit: ### [Dec 28, 2025 — @amritwt](https://x.com/amritwt/status/2005253771488800932) > if there are no juniors today then there will be no seniors tomorrow [x.com/cloneofsimo/st…]() ### [Dec 28, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2005295390430740802) > the only ai coding tools you should be using are either codex or claude code > > anything else and you're ngmi > > "bUt wHaT aboUt oPencoDe cuRsOr zEd megaMind 9000?" > > look into your eyes in the mirror and ask yourself that question > > codex/claude code are like black coffee at starbucks ### [Dec 28, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2005094198689890475) > Opus, gen with nano banana pro please > \>"That's not a real model — sounds like you're testing me or having a bit of fun." > > It's real, Opus. Web search and see for yourself > \>"Interesting — let me verify this is actually real..." > \>"It... actually worked?" > > Read the chat, it's great [Attached image](/x/media/691504ce56473eaadbd9a2bc5a061e58188f8214bb9d7228c753b77f3fa6584b.jpg) ### [Dec 27, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2004812107842552186) > things are already way ahead EOY 2025 than I thought they'd be at the start of the year. > > given exponentials and all that, seems like this year will even further outpace my already-insane (to the layman) expectations > > will revisit this EOY 2026 Quoted post by Greg Kamradt: ### [Dec 26, 2025 — @GregKamradt](https://x.com/GregKamradt/status/2004689800922853378) > If you’re paying attention, it’s overwhelming ### [Dec 26, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2004405392152187222) > im wondering if we can piggyback off the mental zombification and steer towards actually learning something, and i mean absolutely anything at all, instead of just full pure 100% filler slop > > maybe tung tung sahur can show different types of wood? > > AI cat ones teach about Ikigai? Quoted post by kache: ### [Dec 26, 2025 — @yacineMTB](https://x.com/yacineMTB/status/2004370046244508070) > What's really surprising about how horrible the short form video that is actually zombifiying all of our families is that there is a small group of maybe 100 people max that are responsible for it, and if they all stopped, a great deal of child and elderly suffering would stop ### [Dec 25, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2004190108216705276) > we need to generate more web software that generates react websites which sell how-to-generate python courses which teach you how to generate web software that can generate python websites so that you can generate react SaaS websites so you can charge $9/mo to help people gene... Quoted post by ludwig: ### [Dec 25, 2025 — @ludwigABAP](https://x.com/ludwigABAP/status/2004177597945757698) > More slop, faster. Accelerate slop. Build more things that don’t matter. Ship slop faster. As a matter of fact, don’t even write the slop. Let it be generated. Generate everything. More web. More react. More python. More web software. [x.com/github/status/…]() ### [Dec 24, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2003977398610809097) > i used to make a lot of separate single use apps for my workflows > > now i just make a skill > > i am no longer an anthropic basher regarding their agent supplementations ### [Dec 24, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2003721831296172411) > honestly i couldn't have imagined us being where we are in regards to open models at the end of 2025 with the power level that is [@minimax\_ai]() 's M2.1 > > which means that I will be exponentially more shocked next year, this time. > > lets see if that proves true. retweeting in 1 year. ### [Dec 22, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2003131930716631468) > every day I refresh Groq's model page to see if they added a new model. MiniMax M2? M2.1 now? GLM 4.6? Now 4.7 just released? > > nope. still only offering kimi k2. ### [Dec 22, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002893369723531396) > this is true because since Q4 2025, with Opus 4.5 / GPT 5.2, a complete normie with 0 coding experience can easily fine tune a model or even make one from scratch > > now imagine if a normie can do that, > > imagine what the top minds of the world that created these models can do now Quoted post by bayes: ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @bayeslord](https://x.com/bayeslord/status/2002562032416272608) > “timelines” don’t matter anymore. we’re in it. the machine is off to the races. ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002792395109527750) > How quickly have we gone from complaining about a model's intelligence to "yeah it's AGI but it's way too slow" > > Intelligence is ~solved soonish; what's next after speed? What happens when there's GPT 6 with Groq/Cerebras speeds? > > Intelligence -\> speed -\> ...financial gain? ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002750814142767348) > omg this is patient 0 btw > i wonder where he is now. someone needs to check in Quoted post by Ariel: ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @ArielKwiat](https://x.com/ArielKwiat/status/2002722668559380510) > LLM psychosis before it was cool [Attached image](/x/media/6dcfa4452f7bfdcbf536468f89f1132050bd5d93ba2143ab927fc6d548054bf5.jpg) ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002704570972328011) > I went back to using GPT 5.2 X-High instead of the new GPT 5.2 Codex X-High > > The Codex version feels much dumber, at least for the work that I am doing. GPT 5.2 -just gets it-, while the Codex variant needs to be handheld althroughout. ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002655756508917912) > The only thing stopping me now from completely dropping Claude Opus 4.5 and going 100% GPT 5.2 Codex X-High is speed > > I've always been one of the "I don't care about speed as long as it's the smartest SOTA model"... > > but after fondling Opus 4.5 for a few days... I miss the speed. ### [Dec 21, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002560646114840838) > How did this work out last time, ~250 years ago? Quoted post by Helmut Brandstätter MdEP: ### [Dec 19, 2025 — @HBrandstaetter](https://x.com/HBrandstaetter/status/2001945719327043989) > We Europeans have our laws. You will have to learn to acccept them [x.com/undersecpd/sta…]() ### [Dec 20, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002419453653627194) > plan mode finally in codex btw [Attached image](/x/media/a72088004cd55eda2f5f748e3067f9699be647bc9aa36ed8e67b5a64dac5a32c.png) ### [Dec 20, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002414390482809073) > Unlike trying to do creative writing with LLMs, coding is something that, for the most part, has a particular answer, if not an exact answer. > > Programming will be "solved" much sooner than creative writing getting to the point where you will preferably read AI-generated fiction. Quoted post by Samuel Albanie 🇬🇧: ### [Dec 20, 2025 — @SamuelAlbanie](https://x.com/SamuelAlbanie/status/2002336809356046697) > update to That Graph [Attached image](/x/media/9b729a68abcfe4a808bfacb8a5e72ce3760355d181db5c7fdc974977a93f0c89.jpg) ### [Dec 20, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2002362392173551648) > Vibe code with opus 4.5 ultrathink > > Fix its tech debt with GPT 5.2 Codex xhigh > > Double check any missed tech debt with GPT 5.2 xhigh ### [Dec 19, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001928652540530910) > I regret having tasted the speed and niche configurability of Claude Code + Opus 4.5. > > I know GPT 5.2 / GPT 5.2 Codex are smarter (xhigh versions), but damn it are they slow. > > By the time they are done, even though their output is perfect, I forget the direction of development. ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001758927013503292) > when codex cli \<-\> atlas interoperability pls [@ah20im]() [@thsottiaux]() Quoted post by Claude: ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @claudeai](https://x.com/claudeai/status/2001748046175183284) > Using the extension, Claude Code can test code directly in the browser to validate its work. Claude can also see client-side errors via console logs. > > Try it out by running /chrome in the latest version of Claude Code. [Video on X](/x/media/aee70beb4c11a413fdbbc1d88c087832c2cb968b080ca853f6614e2b5ba73366.jpg) ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001584634250068259) > imagine mogging Dia Browser with: > > - a 14 second clip > - of a vibecoded chrome plugin > - it does your entire product's vision > - executes it all flawlessly in a tab Quoted post by Matt Stallone: ### [Dec 15, 2025 — @mattstallone](https://x.com/mattstallone/status/2000702961962418257) > I shipped a feature to [@posthog]() this week, except I don’t work at posthog and posthog didn’t approve it [Video on X](/x/media/6a92a132c9b1ad234452a903dd20b32a86295e28ba2e0b09fdbb4259dabeac76.jpg) ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001541240496763321) > one of my biggest issues with codex has been solved ever since gpt-5.2 xhigh. > > before: first prompts produced the highest quality results, but continuations felt rushed, guessed, non-important > > now: every prompt feels like the first prompt experience. i rarely /new anymore. ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001538270136778928) > nvim and codex is all you need to be cool these days > even cooler if you use codex headless > > feels like the same cool as using nvim in the 2010s and having a super riced out config and obscure plugins no one knows about but are secretly productivity gems > > cool \!= money though Quoted post by alex fazio: ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @alxfazio](https://x.com/alxfazio/status/2001302744963936684) > preferring nvim over vscode > \> cool > preferring cc over cursor > \> not cool > explain this. you can't ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001535174992187888) > how has no one created a degradation benchmark yet? > > check how it performs at different times throughout 24 hours? on weekends? "lazy/holiday EU months"? > > I know there was a paper released roughly about this in 2023 but we're due for a way more tried and tested version now Quoted post by Taelin: ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @VictorTaelin](https://x.com/VictorTaelin/status/2001431627231080867) > No there's no way this is the Opus 4.5 I used a few days ago. > > This thing is brain dead. It is completely moronic. > > I can't accept this is the same model. ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001533645274910776) > and now, tomorrow they're releasing Opus 5.1 > > it's just going to be called Codex Max 5.2 X-High > > and yeah, still slower, but again - you're trading off speed for dozens of IQ points. Quoted post by Michael: ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001170208103559331) > you can use claude opus 5 RIGHT NOW. > > no, not opus 4.5. > > opus 5. > > the only downside is that it's much slower. so if you're fine with trading speed for intelligence, go ahead and use opus 5. > > they named it weird this time though, "gpt 5.2 xhigh", and only available on codex cli ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001532951318917581) > crazy how I can bet on literally anything on gamba sites ("will jimmy steal sarah's lunch from the breakroom again this saturday?") > > but i can't somehow bet/invest on xAI/SpaceX lmao > > [@elonmusk]() isn't X the everything app? can one of those everythings be investing in non-public? Quoted post by @levelsio: ### [Dec 18, 2025 — @levelsio](https://x.com/levelsio/status/2001448146270920986) > [@ChrisJBakke]() Yes please [@elonmusk]() let me invest in xAI ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001170208103559331) > you can use claude opus 5 RIGHT NOW. > > no, not opus 4.5. > > opus 5. > > the only downside is that it's much slower. so if you're fine with trading speed for intelligence, go ahead and use opus 5. > > they named it weird this time though, "gpt 5.2 xhigh", and only available on codex cli ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001117658784395644) > the slow boil death of the US is being brought on by people like bernie and warren > > \>warren "anti-monopoly" crusade against irobot being bought by an american company (amazon) > \>irobot now not only gone bankrupt but was bought up by china and gutted for data > > this smells the same. [https://t.co/zKr3ekW9iU]() Quoted post by Sen. Bernie Sanders: ### [Dec 16, 2025 — @SenSanders](https://x.com/SenSanders/status/2001057004370948131) > I will be pushing for a moratorium on the construction of data centers that are powering the unregulated sprint to develop \& deploy AI. > > The moratorium will give democracy a chance to catch up, and ensure that the benefits of technology work for all of us, not just the 1%. [Video on X](/x/media/78a55c79e781405d61f49021cbe38bf195f3a7e1d428b4c56455b186b1ee9cd3.jpg) ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001113097457778716) > crazy that we can "invest" in prediction markets like "is jerry going to microwave fish in the break room again on thursday dec 18 2025" > > yet we can't invest into obvious long horizon wins like the boring company or space x without doing mental gymnastics "indirect investing" [https://t.co/rzNKHaKyIc]() Quoted post by Elon Musk: ### [Dec 16, 2025 — @elonmusk](https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2001040385272111201) > The Boring Company is so underrated lol [x.com/boringcompany/…]() ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001107461986771262) > all of those ragebait ad games where you have to outline the shape without going over the same path twice are finally going to be useful for designers using this Quoted post by Lukas Ziegler: ### [Dec 16, 2025 — @lukas_m_ziegler](https://x.com/lukas_m_ziegler/status/2000990494575214663) > Supportless, free-form 3D printing\! ⛓️ > > By using low-melting-point Fields' metal and shaping it through surface tension, this process can create highly conductive 3D structures in a single pass, no supports, no post-processing. > > Pretty interesting way of thinking about additive manufacturing, especially for electronics and functional metal parts. > > Just wow. I only know this is from Singapore, anyone has more information about them? > > ~~ > > ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news → [ziegler.substack.com]() [Video on X](/x/media/149099adc548fa117b6a8aa6615ebdc602bc30abce0f7872ad67f42f2cf5f70b.jpg) ### [Dec 17, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2001081921489789102) > openai's new image gen is a quality upgrade over itself, but definitely not better than google's banana pro image gen. > > the yellow tint is gone, but notice the amount of fingers my left hand has, it makes my eyes funky. > > banana pro result and prompt used for both in comments [Attached image](/x/media/fbafef1051b3fa222dcecad3b6ca1b88bcc1cdc549f1fe7192f5a4a602a00486.jpg) ### [Dec 16, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2000728030801530958) > "they danced on charlie kirk's grave, why not dance on reiner's?" > > because you shouldn't be like them, moron ### [Dec 14, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2000106377939972457) > we're already in the "what are the \_ regulations in space? can you do anything there?" phase > > next phase: elon or bezos (probably elon\!) figures out how to create a country in outer space (or buy it i guess? satellite-level real estate?) > > then says "come dock and arrest me then." Quoted post by terminally onλine εngineer: ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @tekbog](https://x.com/tekbog/status/1999913348595662885) > what are the compute regulations in space? can u do anything there? i mean who could possibly find out [x.com/PhilipJohnston…]() ### [Dec 14, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2000104883199127905) > one of my guilty displeasures is spy movies and how often unrealistic or improbable things happen > > "don't touch your ear when spying" is probably part of day 1 orientation at spy school > > yeah i get it, it's roller coaster actionslop entertainment, not a documentary. but still Quoted post by James Bond: ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @007](https://x.com/007/status/1999826691565236512) > Stop. Touching. Your ear. [Video on X](/x/media/6d62132240f8031504e009abc23a8b36a9eae4800ef4288f107e7d251b29b156.jpg) ### [Dec 14, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/2000027091300180447) > it's crazy to me that it's the complete opposite for me > > i use opus 4.5 for speed and when it inevitably starts making mistakes/it's time to clean up its spaghetti code, gpt 5.2 xhigh comes in to save the day (albeit slowly) Quoted post by Nathan Lambert: ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @natolambert](https://x.com/natolambert/status/1999868051915985138) > Too many cases of starting something in Codex that you think is going great then Opus needs to save the day. ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1999775455814303767) > not to mention they now have Opus 4.5 \& GPT 5.2 xhigh to help them speed things up > > the wheel spins faster. Quoted post by Chris: ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @ChrisGPT](https://x.com/ChrisGPT/status/1999748455124611378) > Hard to imagine how much better Opus models can get with 23B$ worth of tpus from Google over the next 2 years ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1999725024669012230) > i always wondered if someone somewhere at least once suffered an attack from this Quoted post by Sawyer Hood: ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @sawyerhood](https://x.com/sawyerhood/status/1999648786885542367) > claude code needs an epilepsy warning [Video on X](/x/media/b126dfc2e8ef8cc4e8a15d506a231a911473ee5abeafd71fdbcdafa88fd64a0d.jpg) ### [Dec 13, 2025 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1999653618660913416) > gpt 5.2 xhigh on codex went nearly 3h last night > > the result was perfectly what I wanted btw Quoted post by Jon Hernandez: ### [Dec 12, 2025 — @JonhernandezIA](https://x.com/JonhernandezIA/status/1999542515750310071) > WHAT THE ACTUAL F\*CK?? > > maybe they went too far with pro? 😂 [Attached image](/x/media/638a8308a5fe26c58d717209e77635a977ff7deb03ebf69a9544e4aa347ea09a.jpg) [Older posts](/x/before/1765589549000-1999653618660913416/index.md) [More from @michaelstolarz](https://x.com/michaelstolarz) Saved from X: 2026-09-07T03:42:59.938Z