Posts on X before May 26, 2025, 3:00:15 PM UTC
I'm trying so hard to max out my Claude Opus 4 usage in every five-hour window I get with the Claude Max $200 plan, but I just can't seem to do it. I never reach the limit, even though I'm working on four different projects at the same time.
Hold on a second—does Anthropic not have a Discord server? The only invite link I could find is dead or invalid.
How are people even communicating about anything related to them if not through Discord? Surely Reddit isn't their only platform.
By the way, in case you didn't know or haven't experienced it yet, Opus 4 just one-shots everything.
Now, keep in mind, I'm using it exclusively through Claude Code, so the results are partly thanks to how it's able to utilize Claude Code.
But yeah, absolutely next-level model.
The only reason I still use Arc, the web browser, is because of their YouTube media player. When you click off into a different tab, it opens up their little mini player.
Oh my gosh, it's the best experience ever. Movement of it, autoplaying next, resizing, all via trackpad...
I've tried using Reddit for the past week or so, subscribing to all of the AI-related subreddits. And let me tell you, it's something that I deeply regret.
If you want to talk about brain rot, all those posts are brain rot. I've yet to find one insightful Reddit post.
no one is talking about it because everyone is too addicted to building/refactoring their projects/businesses with it
it's over, opus 4 qualifies as agi for me, for all of my life's use cases. a better model could never see the light of day and I'd be fine with that
claude 4 opus can literally replace junior engineers. it is absolutely capable of doing their work faster than a junior engineer, cheaper than a junior engineer, and more accurately than a junior engineer and no one is talking about it
opus 4, opus 4, opus 5
comment your: - favorite model of all time - most used model (presently) - model launch you are most excited about I'll start: Sonnet 3.5, o3, GPT-5 and DeepSeek R2 close 2nd
friendly reminder: there are still people out there using gpt-4o-mini (without knowing, of course) and calling AI shit because they don't understand that there are different models
The only benchmark that matters is how much better it works for whatever it is that you do. In my case, Sonnet 4 / Opus 4 are pretty much AGI.
It’s to the point where even if we never see a better model than these, I would be fine with that. Agents / MCPs / whatever is solved.
On Anthropics Internal AI research evaluation suite Claude 4 models underperform Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude Code + Opus 4 practically solves programming btw
I’ve been thinking about this. What’s the saving grace for Apple? The only thing that could save them? Acquire Anthropic
But I don’t think Anthropic would ever do this no matter the amount of money
Apple should acquire Anthropic. Evolve Siri into Claude. That would catapult Anthropic into consumer relevancy and presumably “fix” Apple Intelligence. Make OpenAI really dance.
>repeatedly state they don’t care about themselves, they only care about the people/society
>talk about nothing except how much they don’t care about themselves
>10min video of them talking about themselves (but not really, but kinda?)
>doesn’t even show the product
LMAO WAT
This is exactly why capitalism is always going to be king! Money makes the world go round. Money makes everyone go through sleepless nights to eke out even an ounce more productivity, hoping that competition can be squashed. This goes for any size business!
the cycle never ends. every month, a new "world’s most powerful model" takes the crown we applaud, compare, then wait for the next. it’s a race with no finish line... but where does it end?
the latest gemini pro 2.5 is the only model i've been using to code with. especially today since its thought output has changed, something about the code that it produces now, especially the way it thinks things through, nothing like it out there currently.
lets see claude 4.
something tells me a LOT of people (primarily tech-minded people this year, then the masses next year) will be wanting the latest Google flagship phones rather than iPhones
When I read "iPhone" now, I immediately think "worthless infuriating always-a-pain AI psuedo-assistant"
I've noticed when using Gemini Pro 2.5 in Cursor, its thinking has changes structure. It used to stream in its raw thinking - now it's very organized and comes in completed chunks, section by section
New 2.5 Pro coming soon
@willcb Very useful and enlightening. Thanks a lot. Will get back with a better model soon :)
I just published Obsidian AI Embeddings: Your Vault's New Brain. Check it out here systemsculpt.kit.com/posts/obsidian…
What my daughter said about “the before-time”:
- she chilled in a Baby Battle Royale lobby stocked with every unborn soul, plus NFT-grade mini-griffins as pets, all farming V-Bucks for reincarnation skins
- the place was supervised by a celestial security Ring camera
- free candy
What my daughter said about before she was born: - she was in a "zoo for babies", with all the babies who ever lived and all the baby animals - she met her brother there and picked him to be her brother - there was someone with "hundred thousand eyes" who could see everything … Less
What my daughter said about before she was born: - she was in a "zoo for babies", with all the babies who ever lived and all the baby animals - she met her brother there and picked him to be her brother - there was someone with "hundred thousand eyes" who could see everything x.com/Tobmood/status…
flux persona walkthrough in obsidian
creative flow, no scripting, just prompts
systemsculpt ai, minimal setup, live demo
writer’s block solved on screen
details and free download ↓
transcribing large audio files inside obsidian with systemsculpt
no file size limits. right‑click, convert, done
full srt timestamps and chat summaries
step‑by‑step ↓
obsidian, systemsculpt, and academic papers
search, extract, summarize, compare—inside obsidian
my full workflow, no browser tabs
step by step ↓
If they named the models llama 3.4 instead of llama 4 maybe I’d still be positive about Meta but… wtf was that guys? 😂😂😂
i had the chatgpt pro sub for the first month it came out; o1 wasn't so revolutionary so i didn't decide to keep it;
this changes with experiencing o3 + memories + strict following of custom instructions+... memories
o3 + memories feels like what agi should feel like
amazing.
ok, that was a fun 30 minutes of wasting my time testing out 4.1, back to sonnet 3.5/3.7 lmao
4.1 is trash btw
So it’s over for Meta right? All those billions…
Llama 4 quietly dropped from 1417 to 1273 ELO, on par with DeepSeek v2.5
ChatGPT’s 4o is much better than 4.5, just FYI :)
the new chatgpt is my favorite model to talk to because of its memory. it's like an unlimited custom instructions/reply like this to me window.
Just because you CAN build ANYTHING now, doesn’t mean you SHOULD build EVERYTHING.
My usage percentages have changed from using Gemini sparingly and only when it's high context to now primarily using Gemini and only using Claude when Gemini is having true trouble or is stuck on something.
Wait, so technically you can make your arm into a little mini drone that flies around, picks up stuff for you, which pretty much gives you telekinetic powers? Yes or no?
I never considered prosthetic arms & hands could be wireless Connect your arm’s nerves to a remote hand
No rate limits because no one’s using it 😂
Access Llama 4 Maverick and Scout 17B at the lowest cost anywhere, with no rate limits.
Once I have $10K to do a one fell swoop switch from everything Apple to everything not-Apple, I’m doing it. Powerhouse laptop, Google phone. I’m so sick of Apple’s nonsense, it’s trash now.
Google started rolling out 'Project Astra' in Gemini Live The move brings real-time visual AI, allowing multilingual conversations about anything seen and heard via a phone's camera or screen sharing Coming to Pixel 9 and Samsung Galaxy S25 devices! pic.x.com/TMj0A3pa7o
quasar alpha beats any model I've ever tried, specifically with boomerang mode. unstoppable
RAG is dead AF.
Thank God I didn’t spend a year trying to perfect it for Obsidian
Yeah RAG is dead.
Holy fuck, Gemini Pro 2.5 has had my jaw dropping lately! I don't know what they're feeding that model, but holy shit!
if you're not spending $20 minimum on Cursor every single day, you're wasting your time
new version of GPT-4o particularly good at coding, instruction following, and freedom.
My gauge to see if I'm rich yet or not is the moment I stop paying attention to how much Claude Sonnet 3.7 (Thinking) MAX on Cursor is costing me.
this doesn't count as a self dox, right? me, my wife, my baby 👨👩👧
Damn, bro, this cursor shit is really, you know, changing the world. Goddamn.
I honestly thought people were being stupid and just not knowing how to use 3.7 with Cursor, but recently I've been switching back to 3.5 just to see if the rumor is true, and wow, for some reason, it's solving things that 3.7 just can't seem to do
look at me
look at me
i am the api now
recently i've noticed that the more context you force through to cursor, the worse the results. the best code I get is when it's a fresh chat, given an objective, and it just goes out on its own.
something about it seeing everything all at once makes it have worse output
3.7 thinking for planning out things, 3.7 for executing. that's the meta rn for @cursor_ai
i forgot that i had deep research selected from an earlier tab that i was going to prompt into, and so I got sidetracked and typed this in instead thinking it'll just use canvas
but no, it'll do deep research first. curious to see if the result will be better or worse
if you haven't tried @cursor_ai Auto mode, you should. psychologically you'd think "I always want to use the best model, 3.7 thinking" but you'd be wrong, just like me. it's much better to use auto and vibe code if that's your thing, it truly does pick the best option.
btw in cause you're unaware he's talking about his own models that won't be released to you and I anytime soon
Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei in the next 3 to 6 months, AI is writing 90% of the code, and in 12 months, nearly all code may be generated by AI











