# Posts on X before Dec 9, 2024, 7:15:25 AM UTC Canonical: https://michaelstolarz.com/x/before/1733728525000-1866018799910277333/ ## On X ### [Dec 9, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865945679803367910) > o1 pro shouldn't be your programmer, it should be your architect ### [Dec 8, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865742916028907641) > yeah I mean $200 per month for pro is worth it even if the only benefit was unlimited o1. > > even if there wasn't o1 pro, or unlimited voice mode - just having unlimited o1 is a game changer imo ### [Dec 8, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865712483085988251) > one thing i've noticed so far, using nothing but o1-pro for an entire day, and then now using o1 for an entire day > > is that iteration changes and your workflow in general is much faster with o1 > > I think I'm going to use o1 pro only for very complicated planning/decision trees ### [Dec 8, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865685808751227109) > it's so interesting to see that sometimes when i try to do something in o1-pro, it just can't get it right > > but then i pop it into o1, and it's perfect on the first try > > i wonder what that means... is o1-pro just overthinking everything? gets stuck on something? > > maybe its context window with all of its behind-the-scenes think-through stuff gets all too big, and it just forgets what it's supposed to do? > > very curious to keep testing this out 🤔 ### [Dec 8, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865629555152843081) > i have very mixed feelings regarding O1 Pro. > > on one hand, when it gets it right, it gets it right beyond what you expected. as in, it does things that you didn't even ask for, which is great for certain situations, but terrible and time-wasting for others, because then you have to go back and modify the prompt and specify, hey, don't go ahead and do this, or don't change this. > > so suffice to say, it's hit or miss, except when you hit, it's like you hit the jackpot. and when you miss, it's just a mild annoyance. > > is it worth $200 a month? in my opinion, a quick good gauge for yes/no is if you are able to afford food delivery every day, if you're at that level of disposable income, then yes, you must find a way to rebudget a few things and get this. > > of course, this should go without saying, but if you do end up buying the subscription, you should be using it as many times as you can every single day. > > i'm slowly getting to the point where instead of browsing twitter, i'm browsing O1 Pro. or more specifically, i prompt O1 Pro and then open up my other tab into just typical O1, which responds much faster now. and then i chat there while i wait for O1 Pro, and then back and forth and back and forth, you get the idea. ### [Dec 7, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865347264279183411) > Alright, there goes $200 buckaroos, I'll be using nothing but o1 Pro through the entire next 12ish hours, lets see when/if I hit a rate limit/notification 🫡 ### [Dec 7, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865323162780766289) > I'd be down for a $1,000 / month unlimited API access to o1 pro - (obviously agreeing to their caveat of not using this particular inf. API access for commercial purposes, only self-use/development, duh) ### [Dec 7, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865261977330934040) > One thing I’ve come to realize (fortunately and unfortunately) is that we’re at a point where we can build anything software wise. And I mean that quite literally. If you know how to use agents, self improvement, and just replace your main driver model with whatever’s the latest SOTA… then yeah, there’s nothing you can’t do > > It’s still difficult, but for those that weren’t experts in certain domains, it would take years of study to apply things in a new domain. Now that same level of quality work can be done in a few months ### [Dec 7, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865260892839141482) > as we’re nearing the edge of intelligence being available to the middest of wits, I propose a new giga-autist hyperfocus: > > Architecture. More specifically, planning out pipelines and self-improving automations. > > …even more specifically: system sculpting. 😏 ### [Dec 7, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865259752642748573) > Interesting to see that no one has reached limits yet with o1 pro… > > super interesting. Might just have to try it out ### [Dec 6, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865063570121089496) > The real white pill is realizing Safari is the best browser if you’re deep into the Apple ecosystem already > > Few. ### [Dec 6, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1865022881723486687) > Hahahaha nope, THAT mode is for gooberment / internal use only Quoted post by Max Rovensky: ### [Dec 5, 2024 — @MaxRovensky](https://x.com/MaxRovensky/status/1864737379208073480) > [@sama]() Does the $200 mode remove the thing where it lectures me on morality instead of answering a fucking question? ### [Dec 5, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1864718797468504236) > 100%, anyone complaining about AI killing the software job market (it is) wasn't skilled enough to begin with - programming is not just about knowing how to write correct syntax or terminology, it's about building solutions given a set of tools > > and now one of the most revolutionary tools just happen to be AI - learn to use it accordingly and the opposite will happen (you will become so GOATed that everyone will want to hire you) [Quoted post unavailable](https://x.com/i/status/1864717534273982547) ### [Dec 5, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1864713356965445768) > personally i don't care much about chatgpt itself, i care about what i'll have access to regarding the API > > fingers crossed that these new "o1-pro" and "gpt-4.5" will be available through API usage - idc at what price, I just want to test them in my own environment/sys prompts ### [Dec 4, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1864235158150500669) > it really feels like major softwares of our time with 100+ team members are actually just churning out unoptimized "uniquely designed" slop just so that they ship something > > reminds me of game studios Quoted post by Chamath Palihapitiya: ### [Dec 3, 2024 — @chamath](https://x.com/chamath/status/1864044107347456018) > Is it just me or was 18.1.1 a total turd upgrade. Phone doesn’t work anymore. ### [Dec 3, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863989813919285627) > this +: > - AR (ex. apple vision) > - speech to action > - 3d scene realtime rendering > - suno-level audio generation > -character consistency/“models” > > then all you need is a dedicated empty room to build in; walk around, design a movie, make a game, i mean you’re literally tony stark Quoted post by Krea: ### [Dec 3, 2024 — @krea_ai](https://x.com/krea_ai/status/1863961391167676916) > announcing Krea Editor. > > our new editing tool feels like magic. > > who wants beta access? 👇 [Video on X](/x/media/9c9d7b7e59e4f393cf5816d21aae6c9ec8be122f9bbf479ad0b97cd0897d6ccc.jpg) ### [Dec 3, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863977694930825397) > you can very clearly see when my baby was born, lmao [Attached image](/x/media/a2c0346e058895eafc89d6727d0f638db5f53002c195e2ac40bbfe32bf22ad4e.jpg) ### [Dec 3, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863913388159664137) > i've been seeing a lot of rumblings from openai employees (i analyze their post frequency via their notis being turned on for me) > > it's matching the same frequencies as whenever there's a release coming, so i'm pretty sure something releases this week, maybe even today (tuesday) [Attached image](/x/media/3ee42bc2d9c7949b88a2c5fb9e7e5646fd2fba7a36f7fa8d4f917946b3a3e6a5.png) ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863611107157651792) > my daughter will read my tweets ~15 years from now and wince from the cringe. im so excited ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863598366716051900) > i mean what is even the purpose of spamming 99% offline (1% rate limited to oblivion) gemini experimental models [@openrouter]() [@alexatallah]() [@OfficialLoganK]() [Attached image](/x/media/c049f5f35c71c82148cb56111dc5bc2f87359be81723cef3c1577be589221640.jpg) ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863597616107569415) > TIL perplexity API is pretty useless because there's no Perplexity Pro equivalent (ex. reasoning, ability to use Sonnet 3.6 as the search model, etc) > > Just some outdated llama 3.1 perplexity online models. booooo 😭 [@perplexity\_ai]() [@AravSrinivas]() pls implement, I'll pay w/e ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863593150339768612) > bro, just one more all-nighter, bro. the api rewrite will be so worth it, bro. cleaner codebase, bro. just one more, bro. > > i swear, bro ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863538209571135803) > it's such a shame that o1-preview is retarded about anything "recent", and by recent I mean the last year of progress in AI/APIs/schemas/endpoint capabilities/documentation... > > and then to add fuel to the fire, it doesn't support search lmao ### [Dec 2, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1863485377266557374) > once i hit $1M i'll start using my real name, i feel like $1M net worth (made from scratch from software) is a minimum to take an actual person seriously these days ### [Nov 30, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862814185262104818) > surprisingly, the only 99.9% accurate speech-to-text, of course, after i do a post-transcription on it, is still OpenAI's Whisper API. > > all of these other providers that offer Turbo, like Groq, or any of the versions that are hostable on your own, if it's not that good ol' Whisper, it's just not as accurate. > > what i find that happens very often is, it'll just not transcribe a portion of your speech. i'm not sure why this happens. it'll just skip over things, or it'll do the notorious "..." instead of actually transcribing out the words. > > it's almost as if it's too lazy to do the full transcription sometimes. really interesting behavior. hopefully it's fixed in V4, or whatever. > > but for now, if i want to have a good focus flow, without having to go back and try and fix transcriptions and such, or even worse, having to re-say everything that i initially said, i'm just going to stick with OpenAI's Whisper API for now. and then of course, Sonnet 3.6 for post-transcription touch-ups. ### [Nov 29, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862416172513136676) > nice, hit 100 stars so far, just in time for the fully rewritten mobile friendly v1.0 release :) [Attached image](/x/media/5ce8f4bf6958c3f0c7c277ac1c8248987f938fc68689d65236013fa56b69d31c.jpg) ### [Nov 29, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862413952040542465) > when i first started using Cursor a little over a year ago, i really felt the "10x programmer" meme. especially since i was already so comfortable with the terminal and setting up automations in a pseudo-agent type of way with file watchers and procedures and loops... > > you get the idea. now, with the latest Cursor update, where it has the agent feature, that initial 10x feels like another 10x. it's a steep learning curve, which isn't obvious from a first glance, even for those that use Cursor or code-gen tools every day. > > i think 99% of programmers don't utilize Cursor efficiently. and then 99% of the 1% that do utilize Cursor don't really think through how this new agent feature is as big of a game changer as code generation AI is. > > once people catch on and realize how powerful this is, i don't see any software limitations in terms of what can be created, even if tech progress magically stopped and we never have a better model than Sonnet 3.6 (lmao but you get the point) > > what an amazing time to be alive, waiting for the next state-of-the-art LLM to further this productivity explosion, and more importantly imo, even better workflows that no one has even thought of yet (but AI will for you, especially when personalization becomes an integral part, not even mentioning continuous learning...) ### [Nov 29, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862376779195036056) > "Almost every important piece of software from the last 10 years uses Go" [Animated GIF](/x/media/d35c5f5e6088c43336f69f6e718eca7cd7c3c6b0e63be5472be7c7ee9719240f.mp4) Quoted post by wispem-wantex: ### [Nov 27, 2024 — @wispem_wantex](https://x.com/wispem_wantex/status/1861914400925565017) > Go is the programming language of the internet and the modern era. > > Almost every important piece of software from the last 10 years uses Go: > > - Docker > - Kubernetes > - Terraform > - Prometheus > - Grafana > - Lets Encrypt > - CockroachDB > - etcd > - Ethereum > - Vault > - Packer > - Caddy ### [Nov 28, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862092538846585080) > Remember threads? [Quoted post unavailable](https://x.com/i/status/1862089282154062113) ### [Nov 28, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862084446301909304) > wait until this guy finds out about [@cursor\_ai]() 😂 [t.co/uvL6LH0TGi]() [Quoted post unavailable](https://x.com/i/status/1862019499219685794) ### [Nov 28, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1862038004317188151) > are you even horsemaxxing, anon? come on, get with the times. [Quoted post unavailable](https://x.com/i/status/1861956787685183900) ### [Nov 28, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1861970223970337100) > i may be wrong, but with the way that BS is built, there’s… no way for anyone to circumvent this? it’s literally part of their selling point regarding their protocol > > you love to see it 😂 Quoted post by vik: ### [Nov 27, 2024 — @vikhyatk](https://x.com/vikhyatk/status/1861890953491153081) > [@latkins]() there’s a major controversy currently happening on the other app [huggingface.co/datasets/alpin…]() ### [Nov 27, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1861703988330315875) > 2024 isn't over yet, so i really hope i'm wrong with this next statement, but here it is: > > the only notable advancements that you can really feel in terms of output improvement have been Sonnet 3.5 and the o1/r1 "reasoning" models. > > everything else is cool, but tbh it just kind of seems slopped together ### [Nov 27, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1861633740822413737) > TLDR: pretty much every frontier AI lab has perfected AI text generation slop and so now we can finally focus on what really matters Quoted post by Jason Wei: ### [Nov 26, 2024 — @_jasonwei](https://x.com/_jasonwei/status/1861496796314493376) > Prediction: within the next year there will be a pretty sharp transition of focus in AI from general user adoption to the ability to accelerate science and engineering. > > For the past two years it has been about user base and general adoption across the public. This is very natural because user growth is a critical part any business model. But at this point I would say that there is widespread accessibility of LLMs: for most queries from the average person on earth, many LLMs can answer pretty well. > > In the upcoming five years I think the focal point will be the ability for AI to accelerate engineering and scientific research, which is the engine of progress in technology. At the frontier of innovation in any field, by definition there will be many open questions and a lot of headroom for better AI to make a difference. The stakes will be very high because progress compounds and also because AI accelerating AI research itself is a strong positive feedback loop. > > The other way of saying this is that there is somewhat limited headroom for improving the average user query, but massive headroom for improving the experience for the 1% of queries that would accelerate technological advancement, as well as on queries that people would want to ask the model but currently don’t because models are not smart enough to answer. AI research tends to improve where there is great headroom, and in scientific innovation there be substantial upside. ### [Nov 26, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1861396194456674475) > They're not wrong. > > It's just not the "open" that we're all used to. > > Open here means "open to vulnerabilities," not open source. Definitely not open source. Quoted post by Tom Warren: ### [Nov 26, 2024 — @tomwarren](https://x.com/tomwarren/status/1861392005588308275) > quite the claim from Microsoft here 🤔 [Attached image](/x/media/537b91b1269ecce513a09fcbe7fce08bb01a7b8946bfa052855d20dcceb2795f.jpg) ### [Nov 26, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1861312762758210052) > If you’re ever feeling down and want a stark reminder as to how far ahead you are of everyone else when it comes to AI-anything, just take a look at the replies in this thread Quoted post by Liz Harvey: ### [Nov 25, 2024 — @_lizharvey](https://x.com/_lizharvey/status/1861183827546169553) > Maybe im stupid (im not) but there is literally not a single thing id need chatgpt for??????????? like does it do the dishes? [x.com/ilikefufu\_/sta…]() ### [Nov 23, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1860300619061559535) > It's so funny to see the annual cycle of people finding out about some new Twitter/X replacement... > > ...followed by them flocking over there, convincing their friends and family to use it... > > ...they come back to Twitter and post about it, saying "Oh my gosh, the discourse there is so amazing\!"... > > ...and then this lasts about two-three weeks, after which they silently come back to being full-time on Twitter once again. > > It takes them a while to realize how much they take for granted, and pair that with the fact that the honeymoon phase of using a new app / getting so many likes / comments / engagement with the thought of "wow, I just started, too, and I'm getting so much engagement already\!"... > > All of it fades away and yeah, X will always take you back in. Welcome back. ### [Nov 20, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1859218402159857744) > It never ceases to amaze me how people seem to avoid the reality of impending changes, whatever they may be. > > It seems like, even against all odds, they still hold on to the belief that everything will remain the same. > > In pretty much every field I can think of, whether it's politics, societal structure, software, biology - I change my mind frequently given new information. That's the whole point of progress, right? > > I consistently check to see if I have any static beliefs, and I make sure that I always have worthy reasons to believe what I believe. If not, I go down a rabbit hole of research, playing both the defense and prosecutor positions before I finalize my decision. > > I've trained myself to enjoy changing my mind on something that feels almost hard-coded into me - it honestly feels like a software update that fixed some bug in my code, to put it crudely. > > Most people, from what I can tell, are the opposite - they'll take their opinions and decisions, even if they know they're wrong, to the grave. > > They rather go never saying "you were right" - or worse, "I was wrong". ### [Nov 20, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1859200760015204822) > Big as always from DeepSeek. Quoted post by DeepSeek: ### [Nov 20, 2024 — @deepseek_ai](https://x.com/deepseek_ai/status/1859200141355536422) > 🚀 DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power\! > > 🔍 o1-preview-level performance on AIME \& MATH benchmarks. > 💡 Transparent thought process in real-time. > 🛠️ Open-source models \& API coming soon\! > > 🌐 Try it now at [chat.deepseek.com]() > [\#DeepSeek]() [Attached image](/x/media/b52c1625d7e067ac0f4d8034ae3c3e6e876f8464cb229ecd0bb48d14b24881fa.jpg) ### [Nov 19, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858841477604143152) > Anthropic's Haiku 3.5 would be justified with a 4x price increase if it supported images. > > At the very least, they should have kept the price the same as it was, stating that they're working on image capabilities and then increase the price once that goes into effect. > > All they've really done is shoot themselves in the foot by neither releasing image capabilities nor keeping the price the same, which has led to negative publicity and, for lack of a better term, a failed launch for their "mass use" model. ### [Nov 19, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858699371170431188) > While OpenAI's ChatGPT search has been great for quick questions and straight-to-the-point answers, it fails miserably on any type of follow-up you may have. > > Unless your follow-up is a question about either something else entirely or for something that truly wouldn't make sense for ChatGPT to repeat itself, it will always do exactly that—repeat itself. > > You can see in the screenshot here, all it really does is change a few words, and then it regurgitates the exact same thing, even though I specifically mentioned that it's missing something. > > I'd have thought that by now they would have fixed this, as ChatGPT has been around for, what, weeks? Has it been a month yet? > > Nevertheless, it should have been squashed and hot-fixed because surely this is annoying to more than just myself. [Attached image](/x/media/ab25c90d073bdd55675ec99cd7e7861e2916efe41cefa611a08c29fcfd25ee5e.jpg) ### [Nov 17, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858113036906795322) > I think one of the most influential things that Elon's new DOGE project can do is introduce an evolution to the way that Americans pay their taxes every single year. > > I want to know how much I owe and pay it like a bill. > > I don't want to use paid services. I don't want to guess. I don't want to worry about penalties down the road because something slips my mind. > > Who honestly believes that the IRS doesn't know how much you owe? > > I just want to have a hub where I can dump all of my receipts, expenses, and income streams, whether they come from client work or a 9-to-5 job or the gig economy or crypto investments or... you get the idea. > > It would remove literal months of stress, as well as planning and execution time, from everyone's life every single year. > > I mean, come on, we literally name it "tax season" because it takes a season to go through it and get it all done. > > It's insane to me, and remember, this is all being said without mentioning AI because we all know that it's going to be decades before everyday government services make any practical use of these emerging technologies. > > [@elonmusk]() [@DOGE]() ### [Nov 17, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858084299377160362) > the funniest / most fun timeline would be if this tweet were true and not made in jest. imagine, riemann's hypothesis confirmed being solved through a tweet-er, post. Quoted post by Hieu Pham: ### [Nov 17, 2024 — @hyhieu226](https://x.com/hyhieu226/status/1858028679747829769) · Edited > Grok-3 just proved Riemann's hypothesis. We decided to pause its training to check its proof, and if the proof is correct, training won't be resumed, as the AI is deemed so smart that it becomes a danger to humanity. ### [Nov 16, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857630268494066141) > I've completely removed using GPT-4o from any of my workflows. > > I found that GPT-4o-mini works just as well. > > Rarely do I find room for improvement from whatever processing results I'm looking for. > > For anything I need to designate more brainpower to, I use O1-mini first, and in rare cases, I'll run it just to double-check through O1-preview. > > Absolutely everything else I use Claude Sonnet 3.5. ### [Nov 15, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857389882026639579) > 2025 is really shaping up to be the year of mainstream robotics. > > 2024 has been one very long teaser of what's to come. > > In 2025, we're probably going to see useful general-purpose robotics for under $5,000. [Attached image](/x/media/30078987cbc95b7d93d1c4a5a77b74fa0471bbbbf13db744f6162ad359fb34e9.jpg) ### [Nov 14, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857046483217854517) > It's such a no-brainer that anytime I set up search for anything, I focus on making sure all setting names, as well as short descriptions (if available), are able to be fuzzy found. > > Another fallback for me is usually ripgrep. > > Search results should almost never be empty. Quoted post by Dan ⚡️: ### [Nov 14, 2024 — @d4m1n](https://x.com/d4m1n/status/1856962784682185071) > I feel like no matter how much AI we'll have we won't ever solve Search, Printers and LAN setup [Attached image](/x/media/0e4920abd1dc7f6f7de0a922c3520780a6d00541666b2ae72d0b3fae094ef9fa.jpg) ### [Nov 13, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856657865307726247) > It's so interesting to see everyone talking about scaling thanks to Ilya's quote, but they don't seem to understand that there's different types of scaling. > > It just goes to show that a lot of people seem to rewrite high performing tweets in order to just boost for engagement rather than have something of substance. ### [Nov 13, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856613983173914754) > It's so insane to me that so many people are reading Ilya's quote and the only thing that they're registering are the first and last parts. They completely remove the middle. > > All they see is "results from scaling up... have plateaued." > > Weird how no one is mentioning this is specifically only regarding pre-training. And more importantly, it only mentions ONE of the phases of training an AI model that uses a vast amount of UNLABELED data. Quoted post by Yann LeCun: ### [Nov 13, 2024 — @ylecun](https://x.com/ylecun/status/1856612196437930332) > I don't wanna say "I told you so", but I told you so. > > Quote: "Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of AI labs Safe Superintelligence (SSI) and OpenAI, told Reuters recently that results from scaling up pre-training - the phase of training an AI model that uses a vast amount of unlabeled data to understand language patterns and structures - have plateaued." ... > > [threads.net/@yannlecun/pos…]() ### [Nov 13, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856594590461243522) > Where's the American equivalent of these? I don't think even Boston Dynamics has this kind of maneuverability. It seems so flawless. It edges on... Making me feel as if... These machines are alive, the way they self-correct. Balance. Plan and prepare their next movements. > > Again, I don't see this in any... mainstream American robotics company right now. Maybe we have all of this behind the scenes, but... it's just very weird to see this coming from random Chinese startups. If we have these behind the scenes, what does China have behind the scenes? Quoted post by BURKOV: ### [Nov 12, 2024 — @burkov](https://x.com/burkov/status/1856470402702205109) > You are not gonna hide from an army of these [pic.x.com/dtFsvmr31i]() [Video on X](/x/media/50de6836ffad14e9d8b87bc567d1069cf167807d19c114f8d7698220445ee88e.jpg) ### [Nov 12, 2024 — @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856241792506634408) > probably a SOTA coder if none of the current SOTA labs release something new > > then again, it’s about that time for OpenAI’s early Christmas present… 5o? > > low hopes for anthropic since watching dario’s interview, especially knowing that we won’t be seeing opus 3.5 anytime soon Quoted post by Junyang Lin: ### [Nov 11, 2024 — @JustinLin610](https://x.com/JustinLin610/status/1856044258463240368) > What will come next huh? [x.com/Alibaba\_Qwen/s…]() [Older posts](/x/before/1731397505000-1856241792506634408/index.md) [More from @michaelstolarz](https://x.com/michaelstolarz) Saved from X: 2026-09-07T03:58:13.473Z