# Posts on X before Nov 26, 2024, 7:35:18 AM UTC Canonical: https://michaelstolarz.com/x/before/1732606518000-1861312762758210052/ ## On X ### [Nov 23, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1860300619061559535) > It's so funny to see the annual cycle of people finding out about some new Twitter/X replacement... > > ...followed by them flocking over there, convincing their friends and family to use it... > > ...they come back to Twitter and post about it, saying "Oh my gosh, the discourse there is so amazing\!"... > > ...and then this lasts about two-three weeks, after which they silently come back to being full-time on Twitter once again. > > It takes them a while to realize how much they take for granted, and pair that with the fact that the honeymoon phase of using a new app / getting so many likes / comments / engagement with the thought of "wow, I just started, too, and I'm getting so much engagement already\!"... > > All of it fades away and yeah, X will always take you back in. Welcome back. ### [Nov 20, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1859218402159857744) > It never ceases to amaze me how people seem to avoid the reality of impending changes, whatever they may be. > > It seems like, even against all odds, they still hold on to the belief that everything will remain the same. > > In pretty much every field I can think of, whether it's politics, societal structure, software, biology - I change my mind frequently given new information. That's the whole point of progress, right? > > I consistently check to see if I have any static beliefs, and I make sure that I always have worthy reasons to believe what I believe. If not, I go down a rabbit hole of research, playing both the defense and prosecutor positions before I finalize my decision. > > I've trained myself to enjoy changing my mind on something that feels almost hard-coded into me - it honestly feels like a software update that fixed some bug in my code, to put it crudely. > > Most people, from what I can tell, are the opposite - they'll take their opinions and decisions, even if they know they're wrong, to the grave. > > They rather go never saying "you were right" - or worse, "I was wrong". ### [Nov 20, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1859200760015204822) > Big as always from DeepSeek. Quoted post by DeepSeek: ### [Nov 20, 2024 β€” @deepseek_ai](https://x.com/deepseek_ai/status/1859200141355536422) > πŸš€ DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power\! > > πŸ” o1-preview-level performance on AIME \& MATH benchmarks. > πŸ’‘ Transparent thought process in real-time. > πŸ› οΈ Open-source models \& API coming soon\! > > 🌐 Try it now at [chat.deepseek.com]() > [\#DeepSeek]() [Attached image](/x/media/b52c1625d7e067ac0f4d8034ae3c3e6e876f8464cb229ecd0bb48d14b24881fa.jpg) ### [Nov 19, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858841477604143152) > Anthropic's Haiku 3.5 would be justified with a 4x price increase if it supported images. > > At the very least, they should have kept the price the same as it was, stating that they're working on image capabilities and then increase the price once that goes into effect. > > All they've really done is shoot themselves in the foot by neither releasing image capabilities nor keeping the price the same, which has led to negative publicity and, for lack of a better term, a failed launch for their "mass use" model. ### [Nov 19, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858699371170431188) > While OpenAI's ChatGPT search has been great for quick questions and straight-to-the-point answers, it fails miserably on any type of follow-up you may have. > > Unless your follow-up is a question about either something else entirely or for something that truly wouldn't make sense for ChatGPT to repeat itself, it will always do exactly thatβ€”repeat itself. > > You can see in the screenshot here, all it really does is change a few words, and then it regurgitates the exact same thing, even though I specifically mentioned that it's missing something. > > I'd have thought that by now they would have fixed this, as ChatGPT has been around for, what, weeks? Has it been a month yet? > > Nevertheless, it should have been squashed and hot-fixed because surely this is annoying to more than just myself. [Attached image](/x/media/ab25c90d073bdd55675ec99cd7e7861e2916efe41cefa611a08c29fcfd25ee5e.jpg) ### [Nov 17, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858113036906795322) > I think one of the most influential things that Elon's new DOGE project can do is introduce an evolution to the way that Americans pay their taxes every single year. > > I want to know how much I owe and pay it like a bill. > > I don't want to use paid services. I don't want to guess. I don't want to worry about penalties down the road because something slips my mind. > > Who honestly believes that the IRS doesn't know how much you owe? > > I just want to have a hub where I can dump all of my receipts, expenses, and income streams, whether they come from client work or a 9-to-5 job or the gig economy or crypto investments or... you get the idea. > > It would remove literal months of stress, as well as planning and execution time, from everyone's life every single year. > > I mean, come on, we literally name it "tax season" because it takes a season to go through it and get it all done. > > It's insane to me, and remember, this is all being said without mentioning AI because we all know that it's going to be decades before everyday government services make any practical use of these emerging technologies. > > [@elonmusk]() [@DOGE]() ### [Nov 17, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1858084299377160362) > the funniest / most fun timeline would be if this tweet were true and not made in jest. imagine, riemann's hypothesis confirmed being solved through a tweet-er, post. Quoted post by Hieu Pham: ### [Nov 17, 2024 β€” @hyhieu226](https://x.com/hyhieu226/status/1858028679747829769) Β· Edited > Grok-3 just proved Riemann's hypothesis. We decided to pause its training to check its proof, and if the proof is correct, training won't be resumed, as the AI is deemed so smart that it becomes a danger to humanity. ### [Nov 16, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857630268494066141) > I've completely removed using GPT-4o from any of my workflows. > > I found that GPT-4o-mini works just as well. > > Rarely do I find room for improvement from whatever processing results I'm looking for. > > For anything I need to designate more brainpower to, I use O1-mini first, and in rare cases, I'll run it just to double-check through O1-preview. > > Absolutely everything else I use Claude Sonnet 3.5. ### [Nov 15, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857389882026639579) > 2025 is really shaping up to be the year of mainstream robotics. > > 2024 has been one very long teaser of what's to come. > > In 2025, we're probably going to see useful general-purpose robotics for under $5,000. [Attached image](/x/media/30078987cbc95b7d93d1c4a5a77b74fa0471bbbbf13db744f6162ad359fb34e9.jpg) ### [Nov 14, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1857046483217854517) > It's such a no-brainer that anytime I set up search for anything, I focus on making sure all setting names, as well as short descriptions (if available), are able to be fuzzy found. > > Another fallback for me is usually ripgrep. > > Search results should almost never be empty. Quoted post by Dan ⚑️: ### [Nov 14, 2024 β€” @d4m1n](https://x.com/d4m1n/status/1856962784682185071) > I feel like no matter how much AI we'll have we won't ever solve Search, Printers and LAN setup [Attached image](/x/media/0e4920abd1dc7f6f7de0a922c3520780a6d00541666b2ae72d0b3fae094ef9fa.jpg) ### [Nov 13, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856657865307726247) > It's so interesting to see everyone talking about scaling thanks to Ilya's quote, but they don't seem to understand that there's different types of scaling. > > It just goes to show that a lot of people seem to rewrite high performing tweets in order to just boost for engagement rather than have something of substance. ### [Nov 13, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856613983173914754) > It's so insane to me that so many people are reading Ilya's quote and the only thing that they're registering are the first and last parts. They completely remove the middle. > > All they see is "results from scaling up... have plateaued." > > Weird how no one is mentioning this is specifically only regarding pre-training. And more importantly, it only mentions ONE of the phases of training an AI model that uses a vast amount of UNLABELED data. Quoted post by Yann LeCun: ### [Nov 13, 2024 β€” @ylecun](https://x.com/ylecun/status/1856612196437930332) > I don't wanna say "I told you so", but I told you so. > > Quote: "Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of AI labs Safe Superintelligence (SSI) and OpenAI, told Reuters recently that results from scaling up pre-training - the phase of training an AI model that uses a vast amount of unlabeled data to understand language patterns and structures - have plateaued." ... > > [threads.net/@yannlecun/pos…]() ### [Nov 13, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856594590461243522) > Where's the American equivalent of these? I don't think even Boston Dynamics has this kind of maneuverability. It seems so flawless. It edges on... Making me feel as if... These machines are alive, the way they self-correct. Balance. Plan and prepare their next movements. > > Again, I don't see this in any... mainstream American robotics company right now. Maybe we have all of this behind the scenes, but... it's just very weird to see this coming from random Chinese startups. If we have these behind the scenes, what does China have behind the scenes? Quoted post by BURKOV: ### [Nov 12, 2024 β€” @burkov](https://x.com/burkov/status/1856470402702205109) > You are not gonna hide from an army of these [pic.x.com/dtFsvmr31i]() [Video on X](/x/media/50de6836ffad14e9d8b87bc567d1069cf167807d19c114f8d7698220445ee88e.jpg) ### [Nov 12, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856241792506634408) > probably a SOTA coder if none of the current SOTA labs release something new > > then again, it’s about that time for OpenAI’s early Christmas present… 5o? > > low hopes for anthropic since watching dario’s interview, especially knowing that we won’t be seeing opus 3.5 anytime soon Quoted post by Junyang Lin: ### [Nov 11, 2024 β€” @JustinLin610](https://x.com/JustinLin610/status/1856044258463240368) > What will come next huh? [x.com/Alibaba\_Qwen/s…]() ### [Nov 12, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856166405248561380) > if a government doesn't prioritize intelligence and its own hardware, it'll end up beholden to others. it's already happening, and the difference between prosperity and reliance will only increase (probably exponentially if we're looking at intelligence growth as the main factor) Quoted post by NIK: ### [Nov 12, 2024 β€” @ns123abc](https://x.com/ns123abc/status/1856165414201393223) > 🚨🚨🚨Japan going full BASED: > > - $65B pumped into chips and AI > > -Rapidus is aiming at 2nm chips, gunning for 2nm tech to rival TSMC [Attached image](/x/media/fa782c88264f76f7312b39613ef11e2b3e592dfaa6e216839ac3c9717ae29368.jpg) ### [Nov 12, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1856163339300483544) > i think we'll start seeing AAA studios buying out indie games just like monopolies buy out startups. > > Unfortunately for them though, I think they'll "polish up" the game after takeover, ironically making it worse after going through the AAA studio "upgrade / expand" filters. Quoted post by notch: ### [Nov 11, 2024 β€” @notch](https://x.com/notch/status/1856027999390368045) > Unless you count Bethesda as AAA, I don't remember the last time I played a AAA game. > And shattered space made we want to quit bethesda too. > > Thankfully, the video game industry is doing just fine. Just play indie games. ### [Nov 10, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1855607996849770884) > i downloaded zen browser, used it for 3 minutes, and closed out of it. arc is still king for my use cases. maybe they will open source it? or their new v2 paid version of it will come out soon? idc if i have to pay $10 or whatever. it's a daily driver, why wouldn't I? ### [Nov 10, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1855606315315527978) > it's insane to me that o1-preview is 5x more expensive for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens compared to claude 3.6 sonnet... > > even though sonnet 3.6 is better (at least for coding/creativity). ### [Nov 9, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1855055444865433879) > now anthropic please, then i can remove 80% of custom API code in systemsculpt and just use openai endpoint schema for everything [https://t.co/UgGHSe4azM]() Quoted post by Logan Kilpatrick: ### [Nov 8, 2024 β€” @OfficialLoganK](https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/1854980006927298577) > Gemini is now accessible via the OpenAI libraries\! Update 3 lines of code and get started with the latest Gemini models : ) > > [developers.googleblog.com/en/gemini-is-n…]() ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854533349311951264) > using cursor right now, was in such a great flow state using sonnet 3.6, > > all of a sudden - "Anthropic is experiencing a partial outage right now. To avoid downtime, we've temporarily fallen back to an OpenAI model." > > all of a sudden the most retarded code starts generating ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854468709219545323) > seriously considering removing all of my AI service provider options from SystemSculpt (currently: OpenAI, Groq, Anthropic, Grok, OpenRouter, Local)... > > and just making it super simple: OpenRouter and Local. > > it's becoming more mainstream, has all of the latest models from all of the top providers, a bunch of free models, little to no rate limits vs. native model use... ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854422031804109131) > based and AI-pilled. Quoted post by JD Vance: ### [Mar 4, 2024 β€” @JDVance](https://x.com/JDVance/status/1764471399823847525) > There are undoubtedly risks related to AI. One of the biggest: > > A partisan group of crazy people use AI to infect every part of the information economy with left wing bias. Gemini can’t produce accurate history. ChatGPT promotes genocidal concepts. > > The solution is open source [x.com/vkhosla/status…]() ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854417188956115286) > hopefully they fix this repetitiveness that often (very often) occurs specifically with SearchGPT. hey [@OpenAI]() [@sama]() I love it otherwise; it's my daily search driver since day 1 and I'm not looking back, only forward to even better improvements/evolution. [Attached image](/x/media/9b5f5fe69dab6b758f6a6c646224dfbc7003c33ea379e5a8d4c3d888963d7c5a.png) ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854413036108525673) > i used to drink nearly 2g of caffeine a day - no, not mg, not 2g of coffee, 2g of actual, pure caffeine - mostly in the form of white monster energy drinks (140mg caffeine each) and 30-40 grams of nescafe gold instant coffee (~40mg of caffeine in each gram) ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854366473030132104) > using o1-preview, there's a "new version of chatgpt", giving me two reasoning replies. i think full o1 is coming super soon, maybe next week (or maybe today, thursday?) [Attached image](/x/media/aee78440f138f896b7eb7b500e04d05f51cfd8f7f6f17ae4dd90b7b7c3c5e8fd.png) ### [Nov 7, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854359943538934069) > after trying out [@aide\_dev]() by [@skcd42]() for a 1-file codebase for simple edits, trying out many different strategies of communication to see if my prompting may be the bottleneck, i can confidently say that it's nowhere near cursor-level quality nor efficacy. > > i do have high hopes for it, or rather, its plan -\> execute strategy shown in the sidebar. > > i will revisit it in 1 month. [Attached image](/x/media/9a4fd088e27bdc7423aca3763c07e27a0f766eff5fe109bf41cbfd27d5a36bab.png) ### [Nov 6, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854219891731226775) > the amount of people at openai who are part of its fine-tuning and research that have posted "omg it's the end of the world how could you all vote like this" helps me understand why chatgpt \& co have been particularly useless recently due to such heavy and ridiculous guardrails ### [Nov 6, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854111055171276960) > i wonder what's going on on threads LMAO ### [Nov 6, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1854100271896690731) > what a beautiful start to the day. Quoted post by Ross Ulbricht: ### [May 26, 2024 β€” @RealRossU](https://x.com/RealRossU/status/1794865086135521737) > Last night, Donald Trump pledged to commute my sentence on day 1, if reelected. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. > > After 11 years in prison, it is hard to express how I feel at this moment. It is thanks to your undying support that I may get a second chance. ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853753917613433331) > the worst part of the for you page is that i keep seeing the same shit over and over for the entire day, it feels like it's begging me to like or comment or bookmark it, but no - i will not give in to your ragebait politics slop posts. ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853747045410161066) > if i had $10/m for every time a bot with these same stats followed me (always following over 7K, always under 100 followers), i'd be at $100K MRR [Attached image](/x/media/43587920cdcdc22efa6d0961547402ee9c6ecdb7ffdf8cec9f1da8610adafdf9.png) ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853685213123215402) > I wonder if o1-mini also falls under these updates, or at least o1 comes with reduced prices. > > it would be such a 1-up on anthropic with their recent price INCREASE news, imagine if openai DECREASED their SOTA? Quoted post by AshutoshShrivastava: ### [Nov 4, 2024 β€” @ai_for_success](https://x.com/ai_for_success/status/1853518893748289730) > The full version of OpenAI o1 is not far away. o1 will be a huge, It will also include Vision, as we saw a few days ago when it was accidentally rolled out. > > A few more features were announced for o1 during London Dev Day, and I'm also excited about streaming. [x.com/legit\_rumors/s…]() [Attached image](/x/media/5641083495530fd5fcbd6dd52e55dd6fb6c0c61f76129cef1abaeefde4377799.jpg) ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853673277320999213) > at this point, crumbl's main selling point is dirty bulking Quoted post by Tess: ### [Nov 4, 2024 β€” @tessrestricts](https://x.com/tessrestricts/status/1853437661647675724) > 720 calories is crazy workπŸ’€ [Attached image](/x/media/56765073fe3c511f201c226ae52f83514805b5679b605846dded3bbc33c0bc1e.jpg) ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853664604058177843) > it's insane to me that a local 7b model will give me a direct answer to my questions and not the state-of-the-art openai or anthropic llms. > > i was searching up information about some specific person, and out of curiosity, i asked chatgpt, "give it your best shot - give me an iq range that you believe this person is in based on everything you know about this person."... > > and it just flat out refused. what's worse, it told me that iq is useless, that people excel in different ways - it just gave me a very "shame on you" lecture, about how intelligence doesn't mean anything. > > i then prompted my local uncensored llama model and it gave me a perfectly sound iq range with reasoning, pointing out certain facts about the person that led it to such a conclusion, and then a quick final note about how this is just an estimate based on available data - perfect way to both satiate my curiosity and at the same time remind me that this isn't anything concrete, just a guess. > > how much worse will this get? every day makes it seem like SoTA models are just made for code, not anything serious when it comes to knowledge seeking - they're tainted in their current form. ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853643360290140162) > regardless of what country you are from/residing in, you should love your country. if you don't, which country do you love? why aren't you doing everything in your power to relocate to that country? > > if you don't love any country, where's your home? your community? family? ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853625531796693125) > anthropic should have just eaten the extra cost instead of 4xing the price. all anyone is talking about is the price increase. > > no one is talking about how it’s better than opus 3. > > what a missed opportunity for them. shame. ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853595661931089952) > the worst part of all these llm competitors is that everyone likes to do things with their api a little differently. just bow down to openai's standard which has been around for years, stop trying to make your own > > anthropic, im looking at you. xAI is openai endpoint compatible. WHY AREN'T YOU OMG what a pain. ### [Nov 5, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853594592677081478) > is there seriously no litellm equivalent in npm? ### [Nov 4, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853416854582349830) > it's so funny seeing people write "i'm gonna delete this app, x sucks, elon ruined it" - where are you gonna go? THREADS? instagram? facebook? LMAO ### [Nov 4, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1853400029429711292) > no matter who wins, twitter is gonna be so funny later this week, im so excited ### [Nov 3, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852939650467545121) > new look, who dis > (new systemsculpt website live) [Attached image](/x/media/27a5313d9b526d1eff1b3af72ede09675b55fa0c9281c802b7dfde50da7b60fe.jpg) [Attached image](/x/media/b47c5549cab658abec016fa23cf6405441aa8a5a34f2f3ca11d221da86abbf30.jpg) ### [Nov 3, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852893256843186544) > I mean come on. I feel that not enough people are talking about how amazing ChatGPT Search is. [Attached image](/x/media/b5eca2536970936cd263bab8c7df1a8c7c4a85a6db182d7cccd09fa731b207c2.png) ### [Nov 3, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852883217004757152) > latest random news, chatgpt search vs. perplexity. which do you prefer? i prefer chatgpt search. [Attached image](/x/media/1e19f0788da3692c6483102f485764c0acdca8735dcfdb797a9c352204ea6135.png) [Attached image](/x/media/76eab364e7e7ee5c66dbeca013b9b679a91b59f5cd0a3772febd71caf00fdf6a.png) ### [Nov 3, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852863430711288014) > bro wake up new harambe just dropped 🐿️ ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852796586591715515) > 1,000,000% [@finkd]() is part of tpot, shitposting as a lowkey anon, making sure he keeps up with the vibes as best he can. you think this amazing ai discourse is happening on threads? FACEBOOK? he'd be stupid not to secretly be part of x's ai community (he's not stupid) ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852774691993518542) > after trying out the new version of github copilot, even with o1-preview as the main driver, i can confidently say... it's shit compared to cursor. long live cursor. ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852753049535865014) > i swear, once im at a stable 10k mrr, im making an on-the-fly x feed filter that removes ragebait/engagement bait/politics from my feed. i know musk won't do it, it'd be stupid of him to do so; that's where most money comes from rn it seems ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852731155336003799) > being concise accelerates goal achievement; being precise enhances output quality. with LLMs this is more true than ever before ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852673689747419563) > it really does seem like the full version of o1 has released (by "mistake", imo). so this week, i think, is going to be super interesting. ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @MichaelStolarz](https://x.com/MichaelStolarz/status/1852657395459317892) > white is o1 (full?), black is o1-preview > > unlike o1-preview which gets this wrong, this assumed o1 (full?) gets it correct. it ALMOST falls into the same gender-identity overthinking trap, but it gets it right in the end (you can see it battling with itself in the thinking process, lmao) > > though, it is important to note: o1 tells me "lol this is an old puzzle", so it might just be pulling the final answer's certainty from training data. [Attached image](/x/media/772c661d3480fdccd234e09c6c205920def4250e8ca601508cc5362f7d32e848.png) [Attached image](/x/media/5758e4791d874d23d9b15dc37e0bd8d1f55f641212ea045545cad73e1f4b091e.png) Quoted post by Legit: ### [Nov 2, 2024 β€” @legit_api](https://x.com/legit_api/status/1852625385801859321) > o1 first contact πŸ‘½ > > brought to you by me + [@Jaicraft39]() [Attached image](/x/media/c6b894fe134dd3eca7d5a8b2793687579f485e3278c316ab01c3342c43ba3a2b.jpg) [Older posts](/x/before/1730542918000-1852657395459317892/index.md) [More from @michaelstolarz](https://x.com/michaelstolarz) Saved from X: 2026-09-07T03:58:18.183Z